ArticleDisability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology2018
Assistive technology unmet needs of independent living older Hispanics with functional limitations.
Article in Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of an Assistive Technology Web Application for Primary Care Physicians Serving Older Adults: Concurrent Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Breaking Barriers: The Design and Development of an Assistive Technology Web App for Older Latinos with Disabilities in Daily Activities.Technologies · 2024Article
- Assistive Technology Workplace Accommodation and Employment among Diverse Populations with Disabilities: Does Race/Ethnicity Matter?Journal of rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Digital personal assistants are smart ways for assistive technology to aid the health and wellbeing of patients and carers.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo identify: (1) the most frequently used assistive technology (AT) by a sample of community-living older Hispanics; (2) their AT needs; (3) the AT that would not be used by the simple; and (4) the factors associated with the willingness to use AT. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe used a cross-sectional descriptive study design with a purposive sample of 60 individuals 70 years and older living in Puerto Rico. Data collection tools included a socio-demographic questionnaire and the Assistive Technology Card Assessment. We used descriptive statistics to identify the sample AT use and needs, χ
resultsThe sample had unmet needs for AT devices for cooking, home tasks and home safety. A higher number of health conditions as well as having low educational levels were associated with willingness to use AT devices.
conclusionsPolicy implications are discussed supporting the role of rehabilitation professionals, state government and community-based programmes, including the Area Agencies on Aging, in providing culturally relevant AT education and accessibility to assistive devices. Implications for rehabilitations Hispanic older adults with functional limitations living independently in Puerto Rico have unmet needs for AT devices to compensate for physical limitations and increase safety performance, predominantly in instrumental activities of daily living. New policies need to be developed to advocate for increased healthcare coverage of low tech AT devices that could be highly beneficial to older people with functional limitations. Community-based programs administered by the state government, the Area Agencies of Aging, or operated through Medicare need to be developed to provide education, training, loans, purchasing, and delivery of low AT devices that can compensate for older people functional limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.