ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017
Radiological, clinical and functional evaluation using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire of children with medial epicondyle fractures treated surgically.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical outcomes of management of primary medial epicondylar fractures: A systematic review with meta-analysis.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2026Review
- A meta-analysis of closed reduction percutaneous pinning and open reduction with pin fixation of pediatric humeral lateral condylar fracture.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
- Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning versus open reduction and internal fixation for Jakob type 3 lateral condyle fractures in children.International orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Comparing ultrasonography with plain radiography in the diagnosis of paediatric long-bone fractures.International orthopaedics · 2019Observational
- Pediatric Orthopaedics - from Kirschner wires to titanium.International orthopaedics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe main goal of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes of displaced medial epicondyle fractures with or without associated elbow dislocation in children undergoing surgical treatment and to evaluate upper-extremity function with the Quick Disbilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick DASH) questionnaire. The hypothesis was that patients with associated elbow dislocation would have similar functional outcome to patients with displaced fractures with or without intra-articular entrapment of the medial epicondyle.
methodsA review of medical charts was performed to identify all children and adolescents who underwent surgical treatment for displaced medial epicondyle humeral fractures managed at a single institution. Patients with a closed fracture on plain radiographs, presence of growth cartilages and managed surgically were included in the study. Fractures were radiologically assessed on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and rated according to Papavasiliou and Crawford classification. Functional outcome was measured with the Quick DASH questionnaire. Sixty-six patients met inclusion criteria, and 38 children presented with isolated displaced medial epicondyle fracture (Group A: type II and type III) and 28 with medial epicondyle fractures associated with elbow dislocation (Group B: type IV).
resultsThe Papavasiliou and Crawford system classified 36 fractures as type II (54.6%), two (3%) as type III and 28 as type IV (42.4%). All patients underwent open reduction. Fracture fixation was performed with K-wires in 26 (35%) children and a with single screw in 40 (65%). Mean follow-up was 37.5 months (range, 12-68). Overall complication rate was 18%. In particular, three adverse events (3/38, 8%) were recorded in Group -A and nine (9/28, 32%) in Group B (p = 0.003). Mean Quick DASH score at final follow-up was 4.6 ± 3.8 (range, 0-15.9) and was not significantly different between Groups A (5.4 ± 4.3; range, 0-15.9) and B (4.1 ± 3.5; range, 0-15.9) (p > 0.05).
conclusionsChildren with type II, III and IV medial epicondyle fractures undergoing surgical treatment have good radiological, clinical and functional outcome but warrant special attention to detect intra-articular entrapment of the broken epicondyle. In these cases, both patient and family should be warned of the potential risk of loss of elbow range of motion and possibly poor functional outcome, especially if treatment is delayed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.