Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28326427›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2016

Posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of a classic and its evolutional design.

Pier Francesco Indelli, Gennaro Pipino, Paul Johnson, Angelo Graceffa, Massimiliano Marcucci

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06483178 (A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Gait in Fixed or Rotating Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasties), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06483178 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Gait in Fixed or Rotating Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasties

TypeinterventionalSponsorBelfast Health and Social Care TrustRan2025 to 2027Enrolled90ConditionsTotal Knee Arthroplasty, Knee OsteoarthritisArmsAttune knee implant, Triathlon knee implant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fulfillment of expectations influence patient satisfaction 5 years after total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Article
  10. No difference in joint awareness after TKA: a matched-pair analysis of a classic implant and its evolutional design.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pier Francesco IndelliDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Gennaro PipinoDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Villa Regina Hospital, Bologna, Italy; Faculty of Medical Sciences, Uniludes University, Lugano, Switzerland.
Paul JohnsonDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Angelo GraceffaDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Umberto I Hospital, Enna, Italy.
Massimiliano MarcucciDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinica Ortopedica Universita' di Firenze-CESAT, Firenze, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs continue to be modified to optimize patient's outcome. This study was designed to compare clinical and radiological results of classic worldwide used TKA posterior-stabilized (PS) design to those of its recent evolution.

methodsA consecutive group of 100 patients undergoing TKA using a classic cemented fixed-bearing PS TKA system was matched by age, gender, body max index to 100 patients having the newer cemented fixed-bearing PS design, both by the same manufacturer. Patients were assessed preoperatively, at 12 months and at 24 months minimum follow-up (range, 24-46) in a standard prospective fashion. The outcome assessments used were the Oxford Knee Score, the Knee Society Score, range of motion, and a satisfaction survey. A 2-sample

resultsNo patients were lost at follow-up. At 2-year follow-up, differences in clinical and radiological Knee Society Score (

conclusionsDesign modifications applied to the newer TKA system allowed greater flexion and lower patellofemoral complications but did not appear to achieve better overall clinical scores.

Indexed as

AttuneKneeOutcomesPosterior-stabilizedTKATotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID28326427
PMCPMC5247512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.