Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28326322›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2017

A Comparison of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds Incorporated with Manuka Honey of Varying UMF.

Katherine R Hixon, Tracy Lu, Sarah H McBride-Gagyi, Blythe E Janowiak, Scott A Sell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Keratin Additive for Cellular Adhesion in Transcutaneous Prosthetics.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Natural Cryoprotectant Honey for Fertility Cryopreservation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. "Green" Biomaterials: The Promising Role of Honey.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2021
    Review
  12. Role of Honey in Advanced Wound Care.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine R HixonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Parks College of Engineering, Aviation, and Technology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Tracy LuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Parks College of Engineering, Aviation, and Technology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Sarah H McBride-GagyiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Blythe E JanowiakDepartment of Biology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Scott A SellDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Parks College of Engineering, Aviation, and Technology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6785-3193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringAnti-Bacterial AgentsCell AdhesionCell ProliferationEscherichia coliHoneyHumansHydrogen PeroxideLeptospermumMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningNew ZealandPorosityStaphylococcus aureusTissue ScaffoldsWound HealingAnti-Bacterial AgentsHydrogen Peroxide

Identifiers

PMID28326322
PMCPMC5343224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.