Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28326079›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017

Differences in Ureolytic Bacterial Composition between the Rumen Digesta and Rumen Wall Based on

Di Jin, Shengguo Zhao, Nan Zheng, Dengpan Bu, Yves Beckers, Stuart E Denman, Christopher S McSweeney, Jiaqi Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of dietary NDF/NFC ratios onFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Characterization and genome analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Urea transport and hydrolysis in the rumen: A review.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Di JinState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijing, China; Precision Livestock and Nutrition Unit, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of LiègeGembloux, Belgium; Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Dairy Products of Ministry of Agriculture (Beijing), Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijing, China.
Shengguo ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijing, China; Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Dairy Products of Ministry of Agriculture (Beijing), Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijing, China.
Nan ZhengState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijing, China; Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Dairy Products of Ministry of Agriculture (Beijing), Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijing, China.
Dengpan BuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing, China.
Yves BeckersPrecision Livestock and Nutrition Unit, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège Gembloux, Belgium.
Stuart E DenmanCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, St. Lucia QLD, Australia.
Christopher S McSweeneyCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, St. Lucia QLD, Australia.
Jiaqi WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijing, China; Laboratory of Quality and Safety Risk Assessment for Dairy Products of Ministry of Agriculture (Beijing), Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUGembloux Agro-Bio Tech · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureolytic bacteria are key organisms in the rumen producing urease enzymes to catalyze the breakdown of urea to ammonia for the synthesis of microbial protein. However, little is known about the diversity and distribution of rumen ureolytic microorganisms. The urease gene (

Indexed as

differencerumen digestarumen wallureC geneureolytic bacteria

Identifiers

PMID28326079
PMCPMC5339240
OpenAlexW2592832464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.