Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28326048›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2017

Developing a Taxonomy of Dark Triad Triggers at Work - A Grounded Theory Study Protocol.

Annika Nübold, Josef Bader, Nera Bozin, Romil Depala, Helena Eidast, Elisabeth A Johannessen, Gerhard Prinz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Annika NüboldDepartment of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University Maastricht, Netherlands.
Josef BaderFaculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra Coimbra, Portugal.
Nera BozinDepartment of Psychology, University of Ljubljana Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Romil DepalaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.
Helena EidastIndependent Researcher Tallinn, Estonia.
Elisabeth A JohannessenDepartment of Psychology, University of Winchester Winchester, UK.
Gerhard PrinzDepartment of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria.
Maastricht University · NLTallinn University · EEUniversity of Coimbra · PTUniversity of Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Vienna · ATUniversity of Winchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In past years, research and corporate scandals have evidenced the destructive effects of the dark triad at work, consisting of narcissism (extreme self-centeredness), psychopathy (lack of empathy and remorse) and Machiavellianism (a sense of duplicity and manipulativeness). The dark triad dimensions have typically been conceptualized as stable personality traits, ignoring the accumulating evidence that momentary personality expressions - personality

Indexed as

dark triadgrounded theorypersonality statestaxonomyworkplace triggers

Identifiers

PMID28326048
PMCPMC5339219
OpenAlexW2592748931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.