Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28325992›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology & hepatology2006

Systematic Review: FDA-Approved Prescription Medications for Adults With Constipation.

Brooks D Cash, Brian E Lacy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Laxative co-medication and changes in defecation patterns during opioid use.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2019
    Observational
  4. Chronic Constipation: a Review of Current Literature.Current gastroenterology reports · 2015
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Chronic constipation: new diagnostic and treatment approaches.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2009
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Lubiprostone: a novel treatment for chronic constipation.Clinical interventions in aging · 2008
    Review
  12. Review of the treatment options for chronic constipation.MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brooks D CashDr. Cash is an Associate Professor of Medicine at the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences and also serves as Chief of the Gastroenterology Division and Colon Health Initiative at the Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Md. Dr. Lacy is an Associate Professor of Medicine and is also the Director of the GI Motility Laboratory at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
Brian E LacyDr. Cash is an Associate Professor of Medicine at the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences and also serves as Chief of the Gastroenterology Division and Colon Health Initiative at the Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Md. Dr. Lacy is an Associate Professor of Medicine and is also the Director of the GI Motility Laboratory at the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constipation is a common, often chronic, gastrointestinal disorder that can negatively impact the lives of those it affects and can be difficult to treat satisfactorily. The objective of this systematic review is to identify and analyze the available published literature on US Food and Drug Administration-approved prescription therapies for adults with constipation (episodic and chronic) and to assess their place in therapy, based on the methodologic strength and results of identified clinical trials. Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE databases were used to search the published literature. Studies were included if they were randomized and prospective, conducted in adults (age ≥18), published as full-length manuscripts in English, and compared the test agent with placebo or a comparator(s). Studies were excluded if they involved patients with constipation attributed to secondary causes. Because fully published manuscripts from phase III efficacy trials involving the recently approved medication lubiprostone were not available, a manual search was performed of abstracts from the two annual major gastroenterology meetings (American College of Gastroenterology and Digestive Disease Week) from the past 4 years. Data on study design; number, age, and sex of patients; duration of treatment period; primary efficacy variable; secondary efficacy variables; adverse events; and discontinuations because of adverse events were abstracted from eligible articles. Eligible studies were assessed using well-established recommendations and a preformatted standardized form. A scoring system, with scores ranging from 1 to 15, was used to individually and separately assess the methodologic quality of the studies. Results of this analysis indicate a general lack of methodologically high-quality clinical trials supporting the use of lactulose and PEG 3350 to treat patients with chronic constipation, but data support their use in acute, episodic constipation. Conversely, high-quality evidence for tegaserod and lubiprostone in patients with chronic constipation does exist, though conclusions regarding the role in therapy for lubiprostone are still in development.

Indexed as

ConstipationlactuloselubiprostonePEG 3350polyethylene glycoltegaserod

Identifiers

PMID28325992
PMCPMC5358085
OpenAlexW140634255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.