Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28325942›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Comparative genomics reveals contraction in olfactory receptor genes in bats.

Georgia Tsagkogeorga, Steven Müller, Christophe Dessimoz, Stephen J Rossiter

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Georgia TsagkogeorgaSchool of Biological & Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK. g.tsagkogeorga@qmul.ac.uk.
Steven MüllerUniversity College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Christophe DessimozUniversity College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2170-853X
Stephen J RossiterSchool of Biological & Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK. s.j.rossiter@qmul.ac.uk.
Queen Mary University of London · GBSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene loss and gain during genome evolution are thought to play important roles in adaptive phenotypic diversification. Among mammals, bats possess the smallest genomes and have evolved the unique abilities of powered flight and laryngeal echolocation. To investigate whether gene family evolution has contributed to the genome downsizing and phenotypic diversification in this group, we performed comparative evolutionary analyses of complete proteome data for eight bat species, including echolocating and non-echolocating forms, together with the proteomes of 12 other laurasiatherian mammals. Our analyses revealed extensive gene loss in the most recent ancestor of bats, and also of carnivores (both >1,000 genes), although this gene contraction did not appear to correlate with the reduction in genome size in bats. Comparisons of highly dynamic families suggested that expansion and contraction affected genes with similar functions (immunity, response to stimulus) in all laurasiatherian lineages. However, the magnitude and direction of these changes varied greatly among groups. In particular, our results showed contraction of the Olfactory Receptor (OR) gene repertoire in the last common ancestor of all bats, as well as that of the echolocating species studied. In contrast, non-echolocating fruit bats showed evidence of expansion in ORs, supporting a "trade-off" between sensory modalities.

Indexed as

ChiropteraEvolution, MolecularAnimalsComputational BiologyGenomicsProteomeReceptors, OdorantProteomeReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID28325942
PMCPMC5427940
OpenAlexW2626926348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.