Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28325918›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Robust Analysis of Fluxes in Genome-Scale Metabolic Pathways.

Michael MacGillivray, Amy Ko, Emily Gruber, Miranda Sawyer, Eivind Almaas, Allen Holder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael MacGillivrayDepartment of Mathematics, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN, USA.
Amy KoDepartment of Mathematics, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN, USA.
Emily GruberDepartment of Mathematics, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN, USA.
Miranda SawyerDepartment of Mathematics, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN, USA.
Eivind AlmaasDepartment of Biotechnology, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. eivind.almaas@ntnu.no.ORCID 0000-0002-9125-326X
Allen HolderDepartment of Mathematics, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, IN, USA. holder@rose-hulman.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constraint-based optimization, such as flux balance analysis (FBA), has become a standard systems-biology computational method to study cellular metabolisms that are assumed to be in a steady state of optimal growth. The methods are based on optimization while assuming (i) equilibrium of a linear system of ordinary differential equations, and (ii) deterministic data. However, the steady-state assumption is biologically imperfect, and several key stoichiometric coefficients are experimentally inferred from situations of inherent variation. We propose an approach that explicitly acknowledges heterogeneity and conducts a robust analysis of metabolic pathways (RAMP). The basic assumption of steady state is relaxed, and we model the innate heterogeneity of cells probabilistically. Our mathematical study of the stochastic problem shows that FBA is a limiting case of our RAMP method. Moreover, RAMP has the properties that: A) metabolic states are (Lipschitz) continuous with regards to the probabilistic modeling parameters, B) convergent metabolic states are solutions to the deterministic FBA paradigm as the stochastic elements dissipate, and C) RAMP can identify biologically tolerable diversity of a metabolic network in an optimized culture. We benchmark RAMP against traditional FBA on genome-scale metabolic reconstructed models of E. coli, calculating essential genes and comparing with experimental flux data.

Indexed as

Metabolic Flux AnalysisMetabolic Networks and PathwaysEscherichia coliModels, TheoreticalSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID28325918
PMCPMC5427939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.