Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28325622›Full record

Trial reportBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology

The effect of different nasal irrigation solutions following septoplasty and concha radiofrequency: a prospective randomized study.

Hanifi Kurtaran, K Serife Ugur, Ceyda Sel Yilmaz, Mesut Kaya, Alper Yuksel, Nebil Ark, Mehmet Gunduz

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label study to compare efficacy of a mineral-rich solution vs normal saline after complete ethmoidectomy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hanifi KurtaranTurgut Ozal University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: hkurtaran@gmail.com.
K Serife UgurTurgut Ozal University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara, Turkey.
Ceyda Sel YilmazTurgut Ozal University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara, Turkey.
Mesut KayaTurgut Ozal University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara, Turkey.
Alper YukselTurgut Ozal University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara, Turkey.
Nebil ArkTurgut Ozal University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara, Turkey.
Mehmet GunduzTurgut Ozal University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNasal irrigation solutions are widely used following endonasal surgery. These irrigation solutions remove infective debris and crusts, reducing the probability of synechia formation, and accelerate mucosal healing.

objectiveThe aim of the present study was to compare the effects of nasal irrigation solutions with different contents following septoplasty and concha radiofrequency.

methodsThe present study was a prospective, randomized, controlled simple blind study of 120 patients who underwent septoplasty and bilateral concha radiofrequency. Patients were divided into four groups according to the nasal irrigation solution used: tap water, buffered isotonic saline, saline with xylitol, and hypertonic sea water. Patients were examined on the 7th and 15th postoperative days. A saccharine test was applied to determine mucociliary activity preoperatively and on the 7th and 15th postoperative days. Patients were asked about drying and obstruction using a 10cm visual analog scale. In addition, patients were examined to determine the crusting score.

resultsThere was no significant difference found in the preoperative and 7th and 15th postoperative days' mucociliary clearance times among the four groups. The crusting score was found to be significantly lower in the hypertonic sea water group (p<0.001). Drying and obstruction on the 7th and 15th postoperative days were found to be significantly more comfortable in the hypertonic sea water group (p<0.001).

conclusionHypertonic sea water is the recommended irrigation solution, as it is associated with less crusting, drying, and obstruction in the nose for the postoperative period following septoplasty and concha radiofrequency.

Indexed as

Fresh WaterNasal LavageRhinoplastySeawaterAdministration, IntranasalAdolescentAdultCatheter AblationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMucociliary ClearanceNasal MucosaNasal SeptumSaline Solution, HypertonicClearance mucociliarCrostasCrustingIrrigação nasalMucociliary clearanceNasal irrigationObstruçãoObstructionSeptoplastiaSeptoplasty

Identifiers

PMID28325622
PMCPMC9449243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.