Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28324816›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2017

Sex differences and hormonal modulation of ethanol-enhanced risk taking in rats.

Kathryn G Wallin-Miller, Jordyn Chesley, Juliana Castrillon, Ruth I Wood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Neural Mechanisms Mediating Sex Differences in Motivation for Reward: Cognitive Bias, Food, Gambling, and Drugs of Abuse.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Regulation of risky decision making by gonadal hormones in males and females.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sex Differences in the Neurobiology of Alcohol Use Disorder.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kathryn G Wallin-MillerNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. Electronic address: kwallin@usc.edu.
Jordyn ChesleyDepartment of Cell and Neurobiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. Electronic address: chesley@usc.edu.
Juliana CastrillonDepartment of Cell and Neurobiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. Electronic address: jcastrillon@college.harvard.edu.
Ruth I WoodDepartment of Cell and Neurobiology, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA. Electronic address: riw@usc.edu.
University of Southern California · US

Funding

Anabolic-androgenic steroids promote risky decision makingR01DA029613 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JAKOWEC, MICHAEL WALTER, WOOD, RUTH I. · 2011 to 2019
$2.9M
Ethanol-induced conditioned partner preference in miceR21AA020575 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI WOOD, RUTH I. · 2012 to 2013
$434k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA020575NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthanol (EtOH) intake correlates with increased risk-taking, and sex differences exist in both EtOH use and risk-taking in humans and rats. However, the interaction of sex and gonadal hormones to affect risk-taking under the influence of EtOH has not been determined. This was the focus of the current study.

methodsAdult Long-Evans rats (n=18 males and females) were gonadectomized and received hormone replacement at physiologic levels or blank implants (n=7-9/group). Risk-taking was assessed with probability discounting, requiring rats to choose between a small/certain reward and a large/uncertain reward delivered with decreasing probability throughout each daily session. Before testing, rats received saline or EtOH (0.5 or 1.0g/kg) ip.

resultsIn males, EtOH increased preference for the large/uncertain reward lever (F

conclusionsThese results show that EtOH, sex, and hormones interact to influence decision making. EtOH increases risk taking in males, but not in females. However, EtOH selectively decreases choice latency in females, and decreases loss sensitivity in both sexes. These findings are relevant to understanding human behavior, particularly in adolescents who experience increased hormone levels and often drink EtOH and engage in risky behavior.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingSex CharacteristicsAnimalsDecision MakingEthanolFemaleMaleRatsRats, Long-EvansRewardTestosteroneEthanolTestosteroneChoice behaviorDecision makingGonadal hormonesOperant behaviorRewardSex characteristics

Identifiers

PMID28324816
PMCPMC5400719
OpenAlexW2593500190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.