Article3 Biotech2013
Molecular techniques for detecting and typing of bacteria, advantages and application to foodborne pathogens isolated from ducks.
Article in 3 Biotech, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Bacterial pathogens identified from houseflies in different human and animal settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Veterinary medicine and science · 2022Pooled it
- Tick-borne zoonoses in the Order Rickettsiales and Legionellales in Iran: A systematic review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2018Pooled it
- Distribution of Uropathogens and Molecular Characterisation of Virulence Genes of UropathogenicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of an indigenousIranian journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- A Simple and Label-Free Gold Nanoparticle Assay and Duplex PCR for Rapid Detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae K2.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Article
- Bioactive peptides in Endodontic infections: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- One Health Insights intoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Rapid prediction of vancomycin-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Assessing the potential for Crude Oil degradation by Biosurfactant-producing Bacteria isolated from Marine Ecosystems in Nigeria.Access microbiology · 2026Article
- Molecular Evidence of ClonalFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Presence ofMicroorganisms · 2025Review
- Best among the key molecular diagnostic markers of bacterial vaginosis.AMB Express · 2025Article
- Detection of antimicrobial resistance via state-of-the-art technologies versus conventional methods.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Isolation of Shiga toxin-producingGerms · 2024Article
- Principles, Methods, and Real-Time Applications of Bacteriophage-Based Pathogen Detection.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Review
- Identifying antibiotic-resistant strains via cell sorting and elastic-light-scatter phenotyping.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Increasing student interest with the Bacterial Unknown Identification Project: using mixed cultures to create real-world applications.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2023Article
- Elaboration of Nanostructured Levan-Based Colloid System as a Biological Alternative with Antimicrobial Activity for Applications in the Management of Pathogenic Microorganisms.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Current and Future Technologies for the Detection of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A systematic review and meta-analysis on prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile ofHeliyon · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent times, several foodborne pathogens have become important and a threat to public health. Surveillance studies have provided data and a better understanding into the existence and spread of foodborne pathogens. The application of molecular techniques for detecting and typing of foodborne pathogens in surveillance studies provide reliable epidemiological data for tracing the source of human infections. A wide range of molecular techniques (including pulsed field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence typing, random amplified polymorphism deoxyribonucleic acid, repetitive extragenic palindromic, deoxyribonucleic acid sequencing, multiplex polymerase chain reaction and many more) have been used for detecting, speciating, typing, classifying and/or characterizing foodborne pathogens of great significance to humans. Farm animals including chickens, cattle, sheep, goats and pigs, and others (such as domestic and wild animals) have been reported to be primary reservoirs for foodborne pathogens. The consumption of contaminated poultry meats or products has been considered to be the leading source of human foodborne infections. Ducks like other farm animals are important source of foodborne pathogens and have been implicated in some human foodborne illnesses and deaths. Nonetheless, few studies have been conducted to explore the potential of ducks in causing foodborne outbreaks, diseases and its consequences. This review highlights some common molecular techniques, their advantages and those that have been applied to pathogens isolated from ducks and their related sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.