Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28324458›Full record

Article3 Biotech2014

Pharmacological and therapeutic potential of Cordyceps with special reference to Cordycepin.

Hardeep S Tuli, Sardul S Sandhu, A K Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Reconstruction of a Genome-Scale Metabolic Model forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. The GenusLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  20. Entomopathogenic fungi: insights into recent understanding.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hardeep S TuliDepartment of Biotechnology, M.M.E.C., Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana, Ambala, 133203, Haryana, India.
Sardul S SandhuDepartment of Biological Sciences, R. D. University, Jabalpur, 482001, MP, India.
A K SharmaDepartment of Biotechnology, M.M.E.C., Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana, Ambala, 133203, Haryana, India. anibiotech18@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An entomopathogenic fungus, Cordyceps sp. has been known to have numerous pharmacological and therapeutic implications, especially, in terms of human health making it a suitable candidate for ethno-pharmacological use. Main constituent of the extract derived from this fungus comprises a novel bio-metabolite called as Cordycepin (3'deoxyadenosine) which has a very potent anti-cancer, anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. The current review discusses about the broad spectrum potential of Cordycepin including biological and pharmacological actions in immunological, hepatic, renal, cardiovascular systems as well as an anti-cancer agent. The article also reviews the current efforts to delineate the mechanism of action of Cordycepin in various bio-molecular processes. The study will certainly draw the attention of scientific community to improve the bioactivity and production of Cordycepin for its commercial use in pharmacological and medical fields.

Indexed as

CordycepinCordyceps militarisInfectionMechanismPharmacological effect

Identifiers

PMID28324458
PMCPMC3909570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.