Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28324454›Full record

ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2017

Reward Circuitry in Addiction.

Sarah Cooper, A J Robison, Michelle S Mazei-Robison

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 137 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 259 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah CooperNeuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
A J RobisonNeuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Michelle S Mazei-RobisonNeuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. mazeirob@msu.edu.
Michigan State University · US

Funding

Projection-specific gene expression in resilience to chronic stressR01MH111604 · NIMH · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Michelle Suzanne Mazei-Robison, ALFRED J ROBISON · 2016 to 2026
$4.9M
Neurobiological Mechanisms Underlying Stress-Induced Changes in Opiate RewardR01DA039895 · NIDA · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MAZEI-ROBISON, MICHELLE SUZANNE · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039895NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the brain circuitry that underlies reward is critical to improve treatment for many common health issues, including obesity, depression, and addiction. Here we focus on insights into the organization and function of reward circuitry and its synaptic and structural adaptations in response to cocaine exposure. While the importance of certain circuits, such as the mesocorticolimbic dopamine pathway, are well established in drug reward, recent studies using genetics-based tools have revealed functional changes throughout the reward circuitry that contribute to different facets of addiction, such as relapse and craving. The ability to observe and manipulate neuronal activity within specific cell types and circuits has led to new insight into not only the basic connections between brain regions, but also the molecular changes within these specific microcircuits, such as neurotrophic factor and GTPase signaling or α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor function, that underlie synaptic and structural plasticity evoked by drugs of abuse. Excitingly, these insights from preclinical rodent work are now being translated into the clinic, where transcranial magnetic simulation and deep brain stimulation therapies are being piloted in human cocaine dependence. Thus, this review seeks to summarize current understanding of the major brain regions implicated in drug-related behaviors and the molecular mechanisms that contribute to altered connectivity between these regions, with the postulation that increased knowledge of the plasticity within the drug reward circuit will lead to new and improved treatments for addiction.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsBrainHumansNeural PathwaysSubstance-Related DisordersCocainedopamineglutamatenucleus accumbensrewardventral tegmental area

Identifiers

PMID28324454
PMCPMC5509624
OpenAlexW2598561210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.