Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28324435›Full record

Article3 Biotech2014

Identification of relevant non-target organisms exposed to weevil-resistant Bt sweetpotato in Uganda.

R J Rukarwa, S B Mukasa, B Odongo, G Ssemakula, M Ghislain

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Independent Biological Activity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

R J RukarwaSchool of Agricultural Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda. rrukarwa@yahoo.com.
S B MukasaSchool of Agricultural Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
B OdongoAfrican Institute for Capacity Development, P.O. Box 46179, Nairobi GPO, 00100, Kenya.
G SsemakulaNational Crop Resources Research Institute (NaCRRI), P.O. Box 7084, Namulonge, Kampala, Uganda.
M GhislainInternational Potato Center, P.O. Box 25171, Nairobi, 00603, Kenya.
Makerere University · UGAfrican Institute for Development Policy · KEInternational Potato Center · KENational Agricultural Research Institute · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of the impact of transgenic crops on non-target organisms (NTO) is a prerequisite to their release into the target environment for commercial use. Transgenic sweetpotato varieties expressing Cry proteins (Bt sweetpotato) are under development to provide effective protection against sweetpotato weevils (Coleoptera) which cause severe economic losses in sub-Saharan Africa. Like any other pest control technologies, genetically engineered crops expressing insecticidal proteins need to be evaluated to assess potential negative effects on non-target organisms that provide important services to the ecosystem. Beneficial arthropods in sweetpotato production systems can include pollinators, decomposers, and predators and parasitoids of the target insect pest(s). Non-target arthropod species commonly found in sweetpotato fields that are related taxonomically to the target pests were identified through expert consultation and literature review in Uganda where Bt sweetpotato is expected to be initially evaluated. Results indicate the presence of few relevant non-target Coleopterans that could be affected by Coleopteran Bt sweetpotato varieties: ground, rove and ladybird beetles. These insects are important predators in sweetpotato fields. Additionally, honeybee (hymenoptera) is the main pollinator of sweetpotato and used for honey production. Numerous studies have shown that honeybees are unaffected by the Cry proteins currently deployed which are homologous to those of the weevil-resistant Bt sweetpotato. However, because of their feeding behaviour, Bt sweetpotato represents an extremely low hazard due to negligible exposure. Hence, we conclude that there is good evidence from literature and expert opinion that relevant NTOs in sweetpotato fields are unlikely to be affected by the introduction of Bt sweetpotato in Uganda.

Indexed as

Cry proteinsEnvironmental risk assessmentSweetpotato weevil

Identifiers

PMID28324435
PMCPMC4026458
OpenAlexW2118419800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.