Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28324362›Full record

Article3 Biotech2015

Enabling comparative modeling of closely related genomes: example genus Brucella.

José P Faria, Janaka N Edirisinghe, James J Davis, Terrence Disz, Anna Hausmann, Christopher S Henry, Robert Olson, Ross A Overbeek, Gordon D Pusch, Maulik Shukla and 2 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

José P FariaMathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA.
Janaka N EdirisingheMathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA.
James J DavisMathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA. jimdavis@uchicago.edu.
Terrence DiszMathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA.
Anna HausmannFellowship for Interpretation of Genomes, Burr Ridge, IL, USA.
Christopher S HenryMathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA.
Robert OlsonMathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA.
Ross A OverbeekMathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA.
Gordon D PuschFellowship for Interpretation of Genomes, Burr Ridge, IL, USA.
Maulik ShuklaVirginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Veronika VonsteinMathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, USA.
Alice R WattamVirginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200900040C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many scientific applications, it is highly desirable to be able to compare metabolic models of closely related genomes. In this short report, we attempt to raise awareness to the fact that taking annotated genomes from public repositories and using them for metabolic model reconstructions is far from being trivial due to annotation inconsistencies. We are proposing a protocol for comparative analysis of metabolic models on closely related genomes, using fifteen strains of genus Brucella, which contains pathogens of both humans and livestock. This study lead to the identification and subsequent correction of inconsistent annotations in the SEED database, as well as the identification of 31 biochemical reactions that are common to Brucella, which are not originally identified by automated metabolic reconstructions. We are currently implementing this protocol for improving automated annotations within the SEED database and these improvements have been propagated into PATRIC, Model-SEED, KBase and RAST. This method is an enabling step for the future creation of consistent annotation systems and high-quality model reconstructions that will support in predicting accurate phenotypes such as pathogenicity, media requirements or type of respiration.

Identifiers

PMID28324362
PMCPMC4327756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.