Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28324281›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2017

Detection of minimal residual disease in childhood B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia by 4-color flowcytometry.

Ahmad Baraka, Laila M Sherief, Naglaa M Kamal, Shereen El Shorbagy

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Clinical application of minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute leukemia].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmad BarakaDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. barakalab@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9949-4124
Laila M SheriefDepartment of Pediatric, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Naglaa M KamalDepartment of Pediatric, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Shereen El ShorbagyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Zagazig University · EGCairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) is currently considered the most powerful predictor of outcome in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Achievement of a negative MRD state assessed by multicolor flowcytometry (MFC) is an important predictor of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in ALL patients. We sought to determine whether panels of antibodies combination are more suitable for detection of MRD in Childhood ALL. Eighty-four (84) patients with ALL (B-lineage subtype) were enrolled in this study. Normal template for B cell precursors was established in 15 control participants using 4-four panels of monoclonal Antibodies (Mo Abs),{CD22, CD45, CD58 and CD97 in combination with CD10, CD19, CD34}. At diagnosis, CD22 exhibited the lowest incidence of expression in only 50% of all patients, while CD45, CD58, and CD97 were expressed in 80.9, 59.5 and 92.8%, respectively. Analysis of MRD was performed for each Mo Abs combination at day 0 and day 14 post-induction of chemotherapy by 4-color (FCM). The incidence of MRD was 61.9, 70.6, 60.0 and 55.1% for CD22, CD45, CD58 and CD97, respectively. In B-ALL patients, (CD10/CD19/CD34/CD45) + (CD10/CD19/CD34/CD97) represented the highest incidence of expression of leukemic cells markers with a significant correlation with blasts count, suggesting that these are more specific for MRD detection. Also FCM is relatively cost effective for detection of MRD in ALL patients and its applicability in routine leukemia lab is valuable. MRD evaluation at the end of the induction therapy (i.e. day 35 or 42 according to the different schedules) is advised. Also, Ig/T cell receptor gene rearrangements and gene fusions analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are preferred.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntigens, CDAntigens, NeoplasmCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFlow CytometryHumansInduction ChemotherapyInfantMaleNeoplasm, ResidualPrecursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAntigens, CDAntigens, Neoplasm4-color flow cytometryB-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemiaMinimal residual disease (MRD)

Identifiers

PMID28324281
OpenAlexW2598411946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.