Trial reportJournal of gastroenterology2017
Efficacy and safety of golimumab 52-week maintenance therapy in Japanese patients with moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis: a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study-(PURSUIT-J study).
Trial report in Journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01863771 (A Phase 3 Multicenter, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Randomized-withdrawal Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Golimumab Maintenance Therapy, Administered Subcutaneously, in Japanese Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Multicenter, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Randomized-withdrawal Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Golimumab Maintenance Therapy, Administered Subcutaneously, in Japanese Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Placebo rates in randomized clinical trials of ulcerative colitis: an individual patient data meta-analysis.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of pharmacologic interventions in ulcerative colitis: a network meta analysis.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- What is the optimal biological therapy for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic Literature Review: Ability of the IBDQ-32 to Detect Meaningful Change in Ulcerative Colitis Health Indicators.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Network meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of drugs for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Factors predicting clinical and endoscopic remission with placebo therapy in East Asian patients with ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- First- and Second-Line Pharmacotherapies for Patients With Moderate to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: An Updated Network Meta-Analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2020Pooled it
- Corticosteroid-Free Remission vs Overall Remission in Clinical Trials of Moderate-Severe Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic review and network meta-analysis of treatment for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018Pooled it
- No Benefit of Concomitant 5-Aminosalicylates in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Escalated to Biologic Therapy: Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data From Clinical Trials.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Racial Difference in Efficacy of Golimumab in Ulcerative Colitis.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2023Trial
- Effects of cuproptosis and its application in inflammatory bowel disease (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Potential for anti‑angiogenic therapy targeting the receptor for advanced glycation end products/VEGF axis in ulcerative colitis (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Efficacy of Biologic Agents and Small Molecules for Endoscopic Improvement and Mucosal Healing in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Network Meta-Analysis: Efficacy of Biological Therapies and Small Molecules as Maintenance Therapy in Ulcerative Colitis.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Management of ulcerative colitis in Taiwan: consensus guideline of the Taiwan Society of Inflammatory Bowel Disease updated in 2023.Intestinal research · 2024Article
- Racial Disparities in Infliximab Efficacy for Ulcerative Colitis: Evidence Synthesis and Effect Modification Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Effectiveness and Factors Associated with Response to Golimumab in Japanese Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in Real Clinical Practice: The Phoenix Study.Inflammatory intestinal diseases · 2023Article
- Early-Phase Partial Mayo Score following Golimumab Treatment Is Associated with Endoscopic Improvement at 1 Year in Ulcerative Colitis: A post hoc Analysis of PURSUIT-J Randomized Controlled Trial.Inflammatory intestinal diseases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe global phase 3 studies of golimumab [PURSUIT-SC and PURSUIT-maintenance (M)], an anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFα) antibody, have demonstrated clinical efficacy and safety as induction and maintenance therapies in patients with moderate to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of golimumab as maintenance therapy in the Japanese population.
methodsIn this phase 3, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled, parallel group, randomized withdrawal study, 144 Japanese patients with moderately to severely active UC received golimumab doses of 200 mg (at week 0) and 100 mg (at week 2) subcutaneously during the 6-week open-label induction phase. Patients who responded to golimumab induction therapy entered the DB maintenance (M) phase and were randomized (1:1) to receive 100 mg of golimumab subcutaneous injection (SC) or placebo every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was clinical response through M-week 54; secondary endpoints included clinical remission and mucosal healing at M-week 30 and 54.
resultsAmong induction responders, more patients on golimumab treatment (56.3%) maintained clinical response through M-week 54 versus the placebo group (19.4%). At both M-week 30 and 54, 50% golimumab-treated patients achieved clinical remission versus the placebo group (6.5%) and a higher proportion of patients on golimumab (59.4%) experienced mucosal healing than the placebo group (16.1%). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 96.9% in the golimumab group and 71% in the placebo group. Overall, the efficacy and safety results in this study were comparable with those observed in global studies.
conclusionsGolimumab SC treatment maintained clinical efficacy through week 54 among induction responders, and no new safety signals were observed in the patients with moderate to severely active UC. CLINICAL
trial registrationThe study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01863771.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.