Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28324122›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2017

MR imaging differentiation of Fe

Olaf Dietrich, Johannes Levin, Seyed-Ahmad Ahmadi, Annika Plate, Maximilian F Reiser, Kai Bötzel, Armin Giese, Birgit Ertl-Wagner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Simultaneous FeScience advances · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Furo[3,2-c]coumarin-derived FeScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olaf DietrichJosef Lissner Laboratory for Biomedical Imaging, Institute for Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. od@dtrx.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6182-5039
Johannes LevinDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Seyed-Ahmad AhmadiDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Annika PlateDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Maximilian F ReiserInstitute for Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Kai BötzelDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Armin GieseCenter for Neuropathology and Prion Research, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Birgit Ertl-WagnerInstitute for Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to evaluate the MR imaging behavior of ferrous (Fe

methodsMRI was performed at 3 T in a phantom consisting of 21 samples with different concentrations of ferrous and ferric chloride solutions (between 0 and 10 mmol/L). A multi-echo spoiled gradient-echo pulse sequence with eight echoes was used for both T

resultsThe linear slopes of the relaxation rate were (12.5 ± 0.4) s

conclusionFerrous and ferric iron ions show significantly different relaxation behaviors in MRI but similar susceptibility patterns. These properties can be used to differentiate ferrous and ferric samples.

Indexed as

ChloridesFerric CompoundsIonsIronMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhantoms, ImagingChloridesferric chlorideFerric CompoundsIonsIronFerric and ferrous chlorideIronMagnetic resonance imagingMagnetic susceptibilityRelaxation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.