Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28323478›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2017

Disability Items From the Current Population Survey (2008-2015) and Permanent Versus Temporary Disability Status.

Bryce Ward, Andrew Myers, Jennifer Wong, Craig Ravesloot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exploring the Child Functioning Module in Multiple Surveys in Ghana and Niger.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Spatial distributions in disaster risk vulnerability for people with disabilities in the U.S.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Unmet Need for Workplace Accommodation.Journal of policy analysis and management : [the journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management] · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bryce WardBryce Ward is with the Bureau of Business and Economic Research, University of Montana, Missoula. Andrew Myers, Jennifer Wong, and Craig Ravesloot are with the Research and Training Center on Disability in Rural Communities, University of Montana.
Andrew MyersBryce Ward is with the Bureau of Business and Economic Research, University of Montana, Missoula. Andrew Myers, Jennifer Wong, and Craig Ravesloot are with the Research and Training Center on Disability in Rural Communities, University of Montana.
Jennifer WongBryce Ward is with the Bureau of Business and Economic Research, University of Montana, Missoula. Andrew Myers, Jennifer Wong, and Craig Ravesloot are with the Research and Training Center on Disability in Rural Communities, University of Montana.
Craig RaveslootBryce Ward is with the Bureau of Business and Economic Research, University of Montana, Missoula. Andrew Myers, Jennifer Wong, and Craig Ravesloot are with the Research and Training Center on Disability in Rural Communities, University of Montana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine longitudinal responses to the disability indicator questions that have been adopted as the standard across national surveys sponsored by the US Department of Health and Human Services.

methodsData from the Current Population Survey between 2008 and 2015 were linked to create a longitudinal sample of 721 178 individual respondents.

resultsResponses to the disability questions fluctuated significantly. Although 17% of all respondents reported a disability at some point, only 3% consistently reported the same set of disabilities. Demographic differences were found between people who always reported a consistent set of disabilities and those whose responses fluctuated.

conclusionsThe disability questions capture 2 discrete groups: people who experience a permanent disability and those who experience a temporary disability. Demographic differences between these groups suggest that this is not simply due to measurement error.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesUnited StatesUnited States Dept. of Health and Human Services

Identifiers

PMID28323478
PMCPMC5388941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.