Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28323456›Full record

ArticleAstrobiology2017

Stratosphere Conditions Inactivate Bacterial Endospores from a Mars Spacecraft Assembly Facility.

Christina L Khodadad, Gregory M Wong, Leandro M James, Prital J Thakrar, Michael A Lane, John A Catechis, David J Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Astrobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. What's new and notable in bacterial spore killing!World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Planetary Protection and the astrobiological exploration of Mars: Proactive steps in moving forward.Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christina L Khodadad1 Sierra Lobo, Inc., Kennedy Space Center , Florida.
Gregory M Wong2 Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park , Pennsylvania.
Leandro M James3 NASA, Engineering Directorate, Kennedy Space Center , Florida.
Prital J Thakrar3 NASA, Engineering Directorate, Kennedy Space Center , Florida.
Michael A Lane3 NASA, Engineering Directorate, Kennedy Space Center , Florida.
John A Catechis1 Sierra Lobo, Inc., Kennedy Space Center , Florida.
David J Smith4 NASA, Space Biosciences Division, Ames Research Center , Moffett Field, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every spacecraft sent to Mars is allowed to land viable microbial bioburden, including hardy endospore-forming bacteria resistant to environmental extremes. Earth's stratosphere is severely cold, dry, irradiated, and oligotrophic; it can be used as a stand-in location for predicting how stowaway microbes might respond to the martian surface. We launched E-MIST, a high-altitude NASA balloon payload on 10 October 2015 carrying known quantities of viable Bacillus pumilus SAFR-032 (4.07 × 10

Indexed as

AtmosphereExtraterrestrial EnvironmentMarsSpacecraftBacillusEarth, PlanetMicrobial ViabilitySequence Analysis, DNASpores, BacterialUltraviolet Rays

Identifiers

PMID28323456
PMCPMC5399745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.