Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28323278›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2017

Acceptable symbiont cell size differs among cnidarian species and may limit symbiont diversity.

Elise Biquand, Nami Okubo, Yusuke Aihara, Vivien Rolland, David C Hayward, Masayuki Hatta, Jun Minagawa, Tadashi Maruyama, Shunichi Takahashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Photosynthesis and other factors affecting the establishment and maintenance of cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Marine drugs · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Green fluorescence from cnidarian hosts attracts symbiotic algae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elise BiquandPlant Science Division, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Nami OkuboDepartment of Economics, Tokyo Keizai University, Kokubunji, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke AiharaDivision of Environmental Photobiology, National Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki, Japan.
Vivien RollandAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis, Plant Science Division, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9232-1287
David C HaywardPlant Science Division, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Masayuki HattaGraduate School of Humanities and Sciences, Ochanomizu University, Tokyo, Japan.
Jun MinagawaDivision of Environmental Photobiology, National Institute for Basic Biology, Okazaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3028-3203
Tadashi MaruyamaJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan.
Shunichi TakahashiPlant Science Division, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reef-building corals form symbiotic relationships with dinoflagellates of the genus Symbiodinium. Symbiodinium are genetically and physiologically diverse, and corals may be able to adapt to different environments by altering their dominant Symbiodinium phylotype. Notably, each coral species associates only with specific Symbiodinium phylotypes, and consequently the diversity of symbionts available to the host is limited by the species specificity. Currently, it is widely presumed that species specificity is determined by the combination of cell-surface molecules on the host and symbiont. Here we show experimental evidence supporting a new model to explain at least part of the specificity in coral-Symbiodinium symbiosis. Using the laboratory model Aiptasia-Symbiodinium system, we found that symbiont infectivity is related to cell size; larger Symbiodinium phylotypes are less likely to establish a symbiotic relationship with the host Aiptasia. This size dependency is further supported by experiments where symbionts were replaced by artificial fluorescent microspheres. Finally, experiments using two different coral species demonstrate that our size-dependent-infection model can be expanded to coral-Symbiodinium symbiosis, with the acceptability of large-sized Symbiodinium phylotypes differing between two coral species. Thus the selectivity of the host for symbiont cell size can affect the diversity of symbionts in corals.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthozoaCell SizeDinoflagellidaSpecies SpecificitySymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID28323278
PMCPMC5520142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.