Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28322879›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2017

The association between beliefs about vitamin D and skin cancer risk-related behaviors.

Dawn M Holman, Zahava Berkowitz, Gery P Guy, Natasha Buchanan Lunsford, Elliot J Coups

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vitamin D and Sun Exposure: A Community Survey in Australia.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Health Beliefs About UV and Skin Cancer Risk Behaviors.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
  6. A Review on Sun Exposure and Skin Diseases.Indian journal of dermatology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dawn M HolmanDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, MS F76, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.. Electronic address: dholman@cdc.gov.
Zahava BerkowitzDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, MS F76, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Gery P GuyDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, MS F76, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Natasha Buchanan LunsfordDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, MS F76, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
Elliot J CoupsRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.; Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; Department of Health Education and Behavioral Science, Rutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major health organizations recommend obtaining most of one's vitamin D through dietary sources rather than from sun exposure, given the link between sun exposure and increased skin cancer risk. The purpose of this study is to examine the association between beliefs about vitamin D and skin cancer risk-related behaviors, a topic on which research is limited. We analyzed cross-sectional online survey data collected in the summer of 2015 from 4127U.S. adults aged 18years and older. Overall, 19.7% of adults believed that sun protection would put them at risk of not getting enough vitamin D. However, less than half (43.1%) thought they could get enough vitamin D from dietary sources. Individuals with this belief were more likely to protect their skin when spending time outdoors (71.3%) compared with those who were neutral or disagreed (56.5%; P<0.001). Only 5.1% of adults believed that indoor tanning is an effective way to get vitamin D. Compared to those who disagreed or were neutral, those who thought it was effective were more likely to be outdoor tanners (45.1% vs. 28.5%; P<0.001) and indoor tanners (13.8% vs 1.9%; P<0.001). Beliefs about vitamin D were associated with skin cancer risk-related behaviors. Including information about vitamin D in skin cancer prevention messages may be beneficial.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeVitamin DAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleHumansInternetMaleRisk-TakingSkin NeoplasmsSunbathingSunburnSunlightSunscreening AgentsSurveys and QuestionnairesSunscreening AgentsVitamin DIndoor tanningSkin cancer preventionSun protectionSun safetyVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID28322879
PMCPMC5896002
OpenAlexW2596898605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.