ReviewAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2017
Pregnancy and birth outcomes in couples with infertility with and without assisted reproductive technology: with an emphasis on US population-based studies.
Review in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05716139 (Preeclampsia Following Natural vs. Artificial Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfer), which is not on this map. Cited by 97 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Preeclampsia Following Natural vs. Artificial Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfer
Who cites it
97 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 245 citations in OpenAlex.
- Do IVF culture conditions have an impact on neonatal outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical practice guidelines for the antenatal management of dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Pooled it
- The effect of supportive counseling on self-esteem of infertile women after in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure: a randomized controlled trial study.BMC psychology · 2024Trial
- Beetroot, watermelon and ginger juice supplementation may increase the clinical outcomes of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection cycles.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2023Trial
- Pregnancy rates after slow-release insemination (SRI) and standard bolus intrauterine insemination (IUI) - A multicentre randomised, controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Programmed cycle-induced endometrial perturbations do not independently influence angiogenic imbalance or hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.JCI insight · 2026Observational
- Long-term maternal health outcomes following autologous in vitro fertilization compared with medically unassisted conceptions and with nulliparas.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Protocol for in vivo transfection of mRNA-encapsulated lipid nanoparticles in mouse testis.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Sedentary time during pregnancy and fetal malpresentation in the Japan Environment and Children's Study.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Monochorionic twin pregnancies conceived through assisted reproduction: Maternal and perinatal clinical outcomes.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Observational
- Register and biobank on influence of assisted reproduction on pregnancy, maternal and neonatal outcome : A prospective multicenter medical data register and biobank.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- A to Z of Health: An Evidence-Based Narrative Review of Multivitamin-Multimineral and Nutraceutical Supplementation.Cureus · 2026Review
- Screening-detected refractive errors in infants born after assisted reproductive technology: a prospective cohort study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Neonatal characteristics of children conceived with in vitro fertilization or intrauterine insemination compared with sibling births from unassisted conceptions.Fertility and sterility · 2026Article
- Sperm DNA fragmentation and assisted reproduction: an umbrella meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Reappraisal of adverse obstetric outcomes independently associated with contemporary fertility treatment practices: a US prospective cohort study.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
- The relationship between physical activity and subjective wellbeing in infertile women: the mediating role of positive feedback and self-efficacy.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Differences in Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Between Pregnancies Following Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) and In Vitro Fertilization (IVF): A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The rationale, design of the Assisted reproductive technology cohort nested in a pre-pregnancy family cohort (APP-Cohort).Annals of medicine · 2025Article
37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Infertility, defined as the inability to conceive within 1 year of unprotected intercourse, affects an estimated 80 million individuals worldwide, or 10-15% of couples of reproductive age. Assisted reproductive technology includes all infertility treatments to achieve conception; in vitro fertilization is the process by which an oocyte is fertilized by semen outside the body; non-in vitro fertilization assisted reproductive technology treatments include ovulation induction, artificial insemination, and intrauterine insemination. Use of assisted reproductive technology has risen steadily in the United States during the past 2 decades due to several reasons, including childbearing at older maternal ages and increasing insurance coverage. The number of in vitro fertilization cycles in the United States has nearly doubled from 2000 through 2013 and currently 1.7% of all live births in the United States are the result of this technology. Since the birth of the first child from in vitro fertilization >35 years ago, >5 million babies have been born from in vitro fertilization, half within the past 6 years. It is estimated that 1% of singletons, 19% of twins, and 25% of triplet or higher multiples are due to in vitro fertilization, and 4%, 21%, and 52%, respectively, are due to non-in vitro fertilization assisted reproductive technology. Higher plurality at birth results in a >10-fold increase in the risks for prematurity and low birthweight in twins vs singletons (adjusted odds ratio, 11.84; 95% confidence interval, 10.56-13.27 and adjusted odds ratio, 10.68; 95% confidence interval, 9.45-12.08, respectively). The use of donor oocytes is associated with increased risks for pregnancy-induced hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.78) and prematurity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.83). The use of thawed embryos is associated with higher risks for pregnancy-induced hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.57) and large-for-gestation birthweight (adjusted odds ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-2.08). Among singletons, in vitro fertilization is associated with increased risk of severe maternal morbidity compared with fertile deliveries (vaginal: adjusted odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-2.88; cesarean: adjusted odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-1.98, respectively) and subfertile deliveries (vaginal: adjusted odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.00; cesarean: adjusted odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.35, respectively). Among twins, cesarean in vitro fertilization deliveries have significantly greater severe maternal morbidity compared to cesarean fertile deliveries (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.93). Subfertility, with or without in vitro fertilization or non-in vitro fertilization infertility treatments to achieve a pregnancy, is associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. The major risk from in vitro fertilization treatments of multiple births (and the associated excess of perinatal morbidity) has been reduced over time, with fewer and better-quality embryos being transferred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.