ReviewHuman gene therapy2017
Randomized Clinical Trials of Gene Transfer for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.
Review in Human gene therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Landscape of SERCA2 in Cardiovascular Diseases: Expression Regulation, Therapeutic Applications, and Emerging Roles.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- DWORF Gene Therapy Improves Cardiac Calcium Handling and Mitochondrial Function.Circulation research · 2025Article
- Hypoxia-responsive zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 2 (ZEB2) regulates a network of calcium-handling genes in the injured heart.Cardiovascular research · 2024Article
- Alterations of sarcoplasmic reticulum-mediated CaMolecular and cellular biochemistry · 2023Article
- Review
- New N-aryl-N-alkyl-thiophene-2-carboxamide compound enhances intracellular CaBiophysical journal · 2023Article
- Gene Therapy of Extracellular Vesicles in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Gene Therapy With the N-Terminus of Junctophilin-2 Improves Heart Failure in Mice.Circulation research · 2022Article
- Gene Therapy With the DWORF Micropeptide Attenuates Cardiomyopathy in Mice.Circulation research · 2020Article
- Exercise and cardiac health: physiological and molecular insights.Nature metabolism · 2020Review
- Live-Cell Cardiac-Specific High-Throughput Screening Platform for Drug-Like Molecules that Enhance CaCells · 2020Article
- Challenges and Opportunities for Therapeutic Targeting of Calmodulin Kinase II in Heart.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Lung-targeted SERCA2a Gene Therapy: From Discovery to Therapeutic Application in Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis.Journal of cellular immunology · 2020Article
- Combining Nanomaterials and Developmental Pathways to Design New Treatments for Cardiac Regeneration: The Pulsing Heart of Advanced Therapies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: translation to human studies.Heart failure reviews · 2019Review
- The role of post-translational modifications in cardiac hypertrophy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite improvements in drug and device therapy for heart failure, hospitalization rates and mortality have changed little in the past decade. Randomized clinical trials using gene transfer to improve function of the failing heart are the focus of this review. Four randomized clinical trials of gene transfer in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have been published. Each enrolled patients with stable symptomatic HFrEF and used either intracoronary delivery of a virus vector or endocardial injection of a plasmid. The initial CUPID trial randomized 14 subjects to placebo and 25 subjects to escalating doses of adeno-associated virus type 1 encoding sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (AAV1.SERCA2a). AAV1.SERCA2a was well tolerated, and the high-dose group met a 6 month composite endpoint. In the subsequent CUPID-2 study, 243 subjects received either placebo or the high dose of AAV1.SERCA2a. AAV1.SERCA2a administration, while safe, failed to meet the primary or any secondary endpoints. STOP-HF used plasmid endocardial injection of stromal cell-derived factor-1 to promote stem-cell recruitment. In a 93-subject trial of patients with ischemic etiology heart failure, the primary endpoint (symptoms and 6 min walk distance) failed, but subgroup analyses showed improvements in subjects with the lowest ejection fractions. A fourth trial randomized 14 subjects to placebo and 42 subjects to escalating doses of adenovirus-5 encoding adenylyl cyclase 6 (Ad5.hAC6). There were no safety concerns, and patients in the two highest dose groups (combined) showed improvements in left ventricular function (left ventricular ejection fraction and -dP/dt). The safety data from four randomized clinical trials of gene transfer in patients with symptomatic HFrEF suggest that this approach can be conducted with acceptable risk, despite invasive delivery techniques in a high-risk population. Additional trials are necessary before the approach can be endorsed for clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.