Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28322543›Full record

ArticleACS combinatorial science2017

Titratable Avidity Reduction Enhances Affinity Discrimination in Mammalian Cellular Selections of Yeast-Displayed Ligands.

Lawrence A Stern, Clifford M Csizmar, Daniel R Woldring, Carston R Wagner, Benjamin J Hackel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS combinatorial science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Yeast Display Guided Selection of pH-Dependent Binders.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lawrence A SternDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science and ‡Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Clifford M CsizmarDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science and ‡Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Daniel R WoldringDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science and ‡Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Carston R WagnerDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science and ‡Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7927-719X
Benjamin J HackelDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science and ‡Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3561-9463

Funding

Molecular PET Imaging of MET with Small Protein LigandsR21EB019518 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HACKEL, BENJAMIN · 2015 to 2016
$409k
Engineering Cell-Cell Interactions by Chemically Self-Assembled CARSR21CA185627 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WAGNER, CARSTON R. · 2015 to 2016
$349k
Engineering Reversible Cell-Cell Interactions with Chemically Self-Assembled CARsF30CA210345 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CSIZMAR, CLIFFORD MICHAEL · 2016 to 2019
$144k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA210345NCI NIH HHS R21 CA185627NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB019518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yeast surface display selections against mammalian cell monolayers have proven effective in isolating proteins with novel binding activity. Recent advances in this technique allow for the recovery of clones with even micromolar binding affinities. However, no efficient method has been shown for affinity-based selection in this context. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of titratable avidity reduction using dithiothreitol to achieve this goal. A series of epidermal growth factor receptor binding fibronectin domains with a range of affinities are used to quantitatively identify the number of ligands per yeast cell that yield the strongest selectivity between strong, moderate, and weak affinities. Notably, reduction of ligand display to 3,000-6,000 ligands per yeast cell of a 2 nM binder yields 16-fold better selectivity than that to a 17 nM binder. These lessons are applied to affinity maturation of an EpCAM-binding fibronectin population, yielding an enriched pool of ligands with significantly stronger affinity than that of an analogous pool sorted by standard cellular selection methods. Collectively, this study offers a facile approach for affinity selection of yeast-displayed ligands against full-length cellular targets and demonstrates the effectiveness of this method by generating EpCAM-binding ligands that are promising for further applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorDithiothreitolEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeErbB ReceptorsFibronectinsHumansIndicators and ReagentsLigandsMiceOxidation-ReductionPeptide LibraryProtein BindingProtein DomainsProtein EngineeringTitrimetryDithiothreitolEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeErbB ReceptorsFibronectinsIndicators and ReagentsLigandsPeptide Librarycombinatorial library screeningfibronectin domainligand discoveryprotein engineering

Identifiers

PMID28322543
PMCPMC5521271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.