ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2018
Reduced field of view single-shot spiral perfusion imaging.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Amplitude- and Amplitude-Frequency-Modulated Pulses for Outer Volume Suppression in Cardiac MRI: Application to MyocardialMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Efficient Interleaved Multi-Band Outer Volume Suppression for Highly Accelerated Simultaneous Multi-Slice Imaging of the Heart.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep Learning Assisted Outer Volume Removal for Highly-Accelerated Real-Time Dynamic MRI.ArXiv · 2025Article
- ROBUST OUTER VOLUME SUBTRACTION WITH DEEP LEARNING GHOSTING DETECTION FOR HIGHLY-ACCELERATED REAL-TIME DYNAMIC MRI.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2024Article
- Organoids revealed: morphological analysis of the profound next generation in-vitro model with artificial intelligence.Bio-design and manufacturing · 2023Review
- Signal intensity informed multi-coil encoding operator for physics-guided deep learning reconstruction of highly accelerated myocardial perfusion CMR.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Whole-heart spiral simultaneous multi-slice first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a single-shot spiral perfusion pulse sequence with outer-volume suppression (OVS) to achieve whole-heart coverage with a short temporal footprint of 10 ms per slice location.
methodsA highly accelerated single-shot variable density spiral pulse sequence with an integrated OVS module for reduced field of view (rFOV) perfusion imaging with 2 mm spatial resolution was developed and evaluated in simulations, phantom experiments and in clinical patients with (n = 8) or without (n = 8) OVS. Images were reconstructed by block low-rank sparsity with motion guidance (BLOSM) and graded by two cardiologists on a 5-point scale (1, excellent; 5, poor).
resultsSimulation and phantom results showed that OVS effectively suppressed the signal outside the desired field of view (FOV). Clinical patient data demonstrated high quality perfusion images with rFOV. The average image quality scores of full FOV cases and rFOV cases were 3.1 ± 0.64 and 2.3 ± 0.46, respectively, (P = 0.02) from cardiologist 1 and 2.5 ± 0.54 and 1.8 ± 0.47, respectively, (P = 0.04) from cardiologist 2, showing superior image quality for the rFOV images compared with the full FOV images.
conclusionA single-shot spiral perfusion sequence that uses OVS and BLOSM performs perfusion imaging with a very short temporal footprint per image supporting whole-heart coverage with good image quality. Magn Reson Med 79:208-216, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.