Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28321559›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2017

Is Routine Screening of Young Asymptomatic MEN1 Patients Necessary?

Jerena Manoharan, Friedhelm Raue, Caroline L Lopez, Max B Albers, Carmen Bollmann, Volker Fendrich, Emily P Slater, Detlef K Bartsch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Consensus Statement on Management of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jerena ManoharanDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35041, Marburg, Germany. jerena.manoharan@uk-gm.de.
Friedhelm RauePractice and Molecular Laboratory, Brueckenstrasse 21, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Caroline L LopezDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35041, Marburg, Germany.
Max B AlbersDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35041, Marburg, Germany.
Carmen BollmannDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35041, Marburg, Germany.
Volker FendrichDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35041, Marburg, Germany.
Emily P SlaterDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35041, Marburg, Germany.
Detlef K BartschDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35041, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent clinical practice guidelines recommend that routine screening of MEN1 mutation carriers should start at the age of 5 years. The occurrence of clinically relevant MEN1 organ manifestations in children (≤18 years) was evaluated.

methodsTwo prospective collected databases of MEN1 patients (n = 166) who underwent annual screening were retrospectively analyzed for organ manifestations in MEN1 patients ≤18 years. The follow-up was based on the most recent screening examination until December 2015.

resultsTwenty [11 females, 9 males, (12%)] of 166 MEN1 patients were diagnosed with at least one organ manifestation at age ≤18 years. The most frequent manifestation was mild asymptomatic pHPT (n = 9, 45%, age range 8-18 years). Eight (40%) young patients had pNENs (three non-functioning pNENs, five insulinomas, age range 9-18 years). All five insulinomas were diagnosed based on hypoglycemic symptoms. The other organ manifestations were asymptomatic pituitary adenomas in six patients (30%, age range 15-18 years) and a bronchial carcinoid in one 15-year-old patient. Only six (30%) patients ≤18 years had clinically relevant organ manifestations.

conclusionSymptomatic or severe manifestations in MEN1 patients rarely occur below the age of 16 years. With regard to psychological burden and cost-effectiveness, routine screening of asymptomatic MEN1 patients should be postponed at least until the age of 16 years.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildFemaleHumansInsulinomaMaleMultiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1Pancreatic NeoplasmsPituitary NeoplasmsProspective StudiesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.