Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28321551›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2017

Top-down cortical interactions in visuospatial attention.

Timothy P Meehan, Steven L Bressler, Wei Tang, Serguei V Astafiev, Chad M Sylvester, Gordon L Shulman, Maurizio Corbetta

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neurochemistry of Visual Attention.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy P MeehanCenter for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL, 33431, USA.
Steven L BresslerCenter for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL, 33431, USA. bressler@fau.edu.
Wei TangCenter for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL, 33431, USA.
Serguei V AstafievDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Chad M SylvesterDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Gordon L ShulmanDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Maurizio CorbettaDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USFlorida Atlantic University · US

Funding

Developmental Neuroscience and Child PsychopathologyT32MH100019 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Deanna Barch, JOAN L. LUBY · 2013 to 2026
$4.8M
ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDIES OF HUMAN ATTENTIONR01MH096482 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CORBETTA, MAURIZIO, LEUTHARDT, ERIC CLAUDE · 2012 to 2016
$2.4M
NIMH NIH HHS MH096482-01NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096482NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH100019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The voluntary allocation of visuospatial attention depends upon top-down influences from the frontal eye field (FEF) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS)-the core regions of the dorsal attention network (DAN)-to visual occipital cortex (VOC), and has been further associated with within-DAN influences, particularly from the FEF to IPS. However, the degree to which these influences manifest at rest and are then modulated during anticipatory visuospatial attention tasks remains poorly understood. Here, we measured both undirected and directed functional connectivity (UFC, DFC) between the FEF, IPS, and VOC at rest and during an anticipatory visuospatial attention task, using a slow event-related design. Whereas the comparison between rest and task indicated FC modulations that persisted throughout the task duration, the large number of task trials we collected further enabled us to measure shorter timescale modulations of FC across the trial. Relative to rest, task engagement induced enhancement of both top-down influences from the DAN to VOC, as well as bidirectional influences between the FEF and IPS. These results suggest that task performance induces enhanced interaction within the DAN and a greater top-down influence on VOC. While resting FC generally showed right hemisphere dominance, task-related enhancement favored the left hemisphere, effectively balancing a resting hemispheric asymmetry, particularly within the DAN. On a shorter (within-trial) timescale, VOC-to-DAN and bidirectional FEF-IPS influences were transiently elevated during the anticipatory period of the trial, evincing phasic modulations related to changing attentional demands. In contrast to these task-specific effects, resting and task-related influence patterns were highly correlated, suggesting a predisposing role for resting organization, which requires minimal tonic and phasic modulations for control of visuospatial attention.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAnalysis of VarianceAttentionFemaleFrontal LobeFunctional LateralityHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, NeurologicalOxygenVisual CortexVisual PerceptionOxygenCognitive controlDorsal attention networkHemispheric asymmetryIntrinsic connectivityTask set

Identifiers

PMID28321551
PMCPMC5607080
OpenAlexW2602865727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.