Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28321330›Full record

ArticleActa radiologica open2017

CT venography after knee replacement surgery: comparison of dual-energy CT-based monochromatic imaging and single-energy metal artifact reduction techniques on a 320-row CT scanner.

Masafumi Kidoh, Daisuke Utsunomiya, Seitaro Oda, Takeshi Nakaura, Yoshinori Funama, Hideaki Yuki, Kenichiro Hirata, Masahiro Hatemura, Tomohiro Namimoto, Yasuyuki Yamashita

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta radiologica open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of quantitative measurements of four manufacturer's metal artifact reduction techniques for CT imaging with a self-made acrylic phantom.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masafumi KidohDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Daisuke UtsunomiyaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Seitaro OdaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Takeshi NakauraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yoshinori FunamaDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hideaki YukiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kenichiro HirataDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Masahiro HatemuraDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Tomohiro NamimotoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yasuyuki YamashitaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kumamoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn optimal metal artifact reduction (MAR) technique is needed for a reliable and accurate image-based diagnosis. PURPOSE: Using a 320-row scanner, we compared the dual-energy computed tomography (CT)-based monochromatic and the single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) techniques for CT venography (CTV) to identify the better imaging method for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients who had undergone knee replacement surgery. MATERIAL AND

methodsTwenty-three consecutive patients with suspected DVT after unilateral knee replacement surgery underwent dual-energy CT (135/80 kVp). Monochromatic images of 35-135 keV were generated; the monochromatic image with the best signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the popliteal vein near the metal prosthesis were selected. The projection data of 80 kVp were reconstructed using MAR algorithm. The mean SNR ON MAR and the best SNR ON monochromatic images were compared. Two radiologists evaluated visualization of the metal artifacts on a four-point scale where 1 = extensive artifacts, 2 = strong artifacts, 3 = mild artifacts, and 4 = minimal artifacts.

resultsThe mean SNR was significantly higher on the MAR than the monochromatic images (12.8 ± 4.7 versus 7.7 ± 5.1,

conclusionFor CTV after knee replacement surgery, the MAR technique is superior to the monochromatic imaging technique.

Indexed as

Computed tomography (CT)CT venographydual-energy CTmetal artifact reduction algorithmsingle-energy metal artifact reduction algorithm

Identifiers

PMID28321330
PMCPMC5347276
OpenAlexW2590109427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.