Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28321196›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2017

Connected Speech in Neurodegenerative Language Disorders: A Review.

Veronica Boschi, Eleonora Catricalà, Monica Consonni, Cristiano Chesi, Andrea Moro, Stefano F Cappa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Linguistic features from paragraph recall are markers of cognitive impairment.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Generating Alzheimer's narratives using large language models.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Identifying neuropathologic disease in primary progressive aphasia using narrative speech.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Veronica BoschiNETS, Center for Neurocognition, Epistemology and Theoretical Syntax, Institute for Advanced Study-Pavia Pavia, Italy.
Eleonora CatricalàNETS, Center for Neurocognition, Epistemology and Theoretical Syntax, Institute for Advanced Study-Pavia Pavia, Italy.
Monica ConsonniThird Neurology Unit and Motor Neuron Diseases Center, IRCCS Foundation "Carlo Besta" Neurological Institute Milan, Italy.
Cristiano ChesiNETS, Center for Neurocognition, Epistemology and Theoretical Syntax, Institute for Advanced Study-Pavia Pavia, Italy.
Andrea MoroNETS, Center for Neurocognition, Epistemology and Theoretical Syntax, Institute for Advanced Study-Pavia Pavia, Italy.
Stefano F CappaNETS, Center for Neurocognition, Epistemology and Theoretical Syntax, Institute for Advanced Study-PaviaPavia, Italy; IRCCS S. Giovanni di Dio FatebenefratelliBrescia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language assessment has a crucial role in the clinical diagnosis of several neurodegenerative diseases. The analysis of extended speech production is a precious source of information encompassing the phonetic, phonological, lexico-semantic, morpho-syntactic, and pragmatic levels of language organization. The knowledge about the distinctive linguistic variables identifying language deficits associated to different neurodegenerative diseases has progressively improved in the last years. However, the heterogeneity of such variables and of the way they are measured and classified limits any generalization and makes the comparison among studies difficult. Here we present an exhaustive review of the studies focusing on the linguistic variables derived from the analysis of connected speech samples, with the aim of characterizing the language disorders of the most prevalent neurodegenerative diseases, including primary progressive aphasia, Alzheimer's disease, movement disorders, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. A total of 61 studies have been included, considering only those reporting group analysis and comparisons with a group of healthy persons. This review first analyzes the differences in the tasks used to elicit connected speech, namely picture description, story narration, and interview, considering the possible different contributions to the assessment of different linguistic domains. This is followed by an analysis of the terminologies and of the methods of measurements of the variables, indicating the need for harmonization and standardization. The final section reviews the linguistic domains affected by each different neurodegenerative disease, indicating the variables most consistently impaired at each level and suggesting the key variables helping in the differential diagnosis among diseases. While a large amount of valuable information is already available, the review highlights the need of further work, including the development of automated methods, to take advantage of the richness of connected speech analysis for both research and clinical purposes.

Indexed as

connected speechinterviewlinguistic domainslinguistic variablesneurodegenerative disorderspicture descriptionreviewstory narration

Identifiers

PMID28321196
PMCPMC5337522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.