Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28321182›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2017

Sparse and Specific Coding during Information Transmission between Co-cultured Dentate Gyrus and CA3 Hippocampal Networks.

Daniele Poli, Srikanth Thiagarajan, Thomas B DeMarse, Bruce C Wheeler, Gregory J Brewer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Coupling ofFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniele PoliDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, CA, USA.
Srikanth ThiagarajanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, CA, USA.
Thomas B DeMarseDepartment of Neurology, University of North CarolinaChapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA.
Bruce C WheelerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of FloridaGainesville, FL, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of CaliforniaSan Diego, CA, USA.
Gregory J BrewerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of CaliforniaIrvine, CA, USA; Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders (MIND) Institute, University of CaliforniaIrvine, CA, USA.
University of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Florida · USIrvine University · US

Funding

ENGINEERING FORM AND FUNCTION IN NEURONAL NETWORKSR01NS052233 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI WHEELER, BRUCE C. · 2006 to 2016
$4.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To better understand encoding and decoding of stimulus information in two specific hippocampal sub-regions, we isolated and co-cultured rat primary dentate gyrus (DG) and CA3 neurons within a two-chamber device with axonal connectivity via micro-tunnels. We tested the hypothesis that, in these engineered networks, decoding performance of stimulus site information would be more accurate when stimuli and information flow occur in anatomically correct feed-forward DG to CA3 vs. CA3 back to DG. In particular, we characterized the neural code of these sub-regions by measuring sparseness and uniqueness of the responses evoked by specific paired-pulse stimuli. We used the evoked responses in CA3 to decode the stimulation sites in DG (and vice-versa) by means of learning algorithms for classification (support vector machine, SVM). The device was placed over an 8 × 8 grid of extracellular electrodes (micro-electrode array, MEA) in order to provide a platform for monitoring development, self-organization, and improved access to stimulation and recording at multiple sites. The micro-tunnels were designed with dimensions 3 × 10 × 400 μm allowing axonal growth but not migration of cell bodies and long enough to exclude traversal by dendrites. Paired-pulse stimulation (inter-pulse interval 50 ms) was applied at 22 different sites and repeated 25 times in each chamber for each sub-region to evoke time-locked activity. DG-DG and CA3-CA3 networks were used as controls. Stimulation in DG drove signals through the axons in the tunnels to activate a relatively small set of specific electrodes in CA3 (sparse code). CA3-CA3 and DG-DG controls were less sparse in coding than CA3 in DG-CA3 networks. Using all target electrodes with the three highest spike rates (14%), the evoked responses in CA3 specified each stimulation site in DG with optimum uniqueness of 64%. Finally, by SVM learning, these evoked responses in CA3 correctly decoded the stimulation sites in DG for 43% of the trials, significantly higher than the reverse, i.e., how well-recording in DG could predict the stimulation site in CA3. In conclusion, our co-cultured model for the

Indexed as

Machine LearningAnimalsCA3 Region, HippocampalCells, CulturedDentate GyrusEvoked PotentialsMicroelectrodesModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeuronsRatsCA3decodingDGhippocampusmachine learningmicro-electrode arraynetworkneural code

Identifiers

PMID28321182
PMCPMC5337490
OpenAlexW2592727900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.