ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2017
Outcomes of gastrointestinal defect closure with an over-the-scope clip system in a multicenter experience: An analysis of a successful suction method.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical efficacy of the over-the-scope clip device: A systematic review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Pooled it
- Successful closure of a duodenal stump leak with an over-the-scope clip using double-balloon endoscope.Endoscopy · 2024Article
- Advancements in endoscopic hemostasis for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Review
- Outcomes of Endoscopic Intervention Using Over-the-Scope Clips for Anastomotic Leakage Involving Secondary Fistula after Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Japanese Multicenter Case Series.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Endoscopic negative pressure therapy for duodenal leaks.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Efficacy and safety of over-the-scope clips (OTSC®) for closure of gastrointestinal fistulas less than 2 cm.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Successful closure with covered self-expandable metal stent for severe anastomotic leakage in the cervical esophagus.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- A Single-Center Case Series of Endoscopically Treated Aorto-Gastrointestinal Fistula after Endovascular Aortic Repair: Surgery Is Still the Only Valid Solution.Visceral medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Peroral traction-assisted natural orifice trans-anal flexible endoscopic rectosigmoidectomy followed by intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis in a live porcine model.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2020Article
- Successful treatment of enterocutaneous fistula after esophagectomy with scopolamine ointment and negative pressure wound therapy: a case report.Surgical case reports · 2020Article
- Filling of Polyglycolic Acid Sheets for Closure of Gastrointestinal Fistulas With an Easily Deliverable Technique Using a Guidewire.Gastroenterology research · 2020Article
- Endoscopic closure of refractory esophageal fistula after esophagectomy using polyglycolic acid sheets: a pilot study.Endoscopy international open · 2020Article
- Complete Closure of Gastric Defect with Improved Purse-String Suture Technique Using Single-Channel Endoscope.Chinese medical journal · 2018Article
- Outcomes of over-the-scope clip application in various gastrointestinal indications: experience from a tertiary care in India.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo demonstrate the clinical outcomes of a multicenter experience and to suggest guidelines for choosing a suction method.
methodsThis retrospective study at 5 medical centers involved 58 consecutive patients undergoing over-the-scope clips (OTSCs) placement. The overall rates of technical success (TSR), clinical success (CSR), complications, and procedure time were analyzed as major outcomes. Subsequently, 56 patients, excluding two cases that used the Anchor device, were divided into two groups: 14 cases of simple suction (SS-group) and 42 cases using the Twin Grasper (TG-group). Secondary evaluation was performed to clarify the predictors of OTSC success.
resultsThe TSR, CSR, complication rate, and median procedure time were 89.7%, 84.5%, 1.8%, and 8 (range 1-36) min, respectively, demonstrating good outcomes. However, significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the mean procedure time (5.9 min
conclusionOTSC system is a safe and effective therapeutic option for gastrointestinal defects. Individualized selection of the suction method based on particular clinical conditions may contribute to the improvement of OTSC success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.