Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28321129›Full record

ArticleNature2017

Cerebellar granule cells encode the expectation of reward.

Mark J Wagner, Tony Hyun Kim, Joan Savall, Mark J Schnitzer, Liqun Luo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 282 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
282citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
32.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

282 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 509 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Unsupervised nonmotor learning in the human cerebellum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. The Cerebellar Connectome.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Human Cerebellum Encodes Temporally Sensitive Reinforcement Learning Signals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

222 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark J WagnerDepartment of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Tony Hyun KimDepartment of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Joan SavallDepartment of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Mark J SchnitzerDepartment of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Liqun LuoDepartment of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Stanford University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Mosaic Analysis with Double Markers in MiceR01NS050835 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LIQUN LUO · 2005 to 2026
$7.3M
EPILEPSY TRAINING PROGRAMT32NS007280 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HUGUENARD, JOHN R · 1985 to 2020
$3.6M
Octopus microscopy for imaging multiple brain areas concurrentlyR01MH103116 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCHNITZER, MARK J · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103116NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050835NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human brain contains approximately 60 billion cerebellar granule cells, which outnumber all other brain neurons combined. Classical theories posit that a large, diverse population of granule cells allows for highly detailed representations of sensorimotor context, enabling downstream Purkinje cells to sense fine contextual changes. Although evidence suggests a role for the cerebellum in cognition, granule cells are known to encode only sensory and motor context. Here, using two-photon calcium imaging in behaving mice, we show that granule cells convey information about the expectation of reward. Mice initiated voluntary forelimb movements for delayed sugar-water reward. Some granule cells responded preferentially to reward or reward omission, whereas others selectively encoded reward anticipation. Reward responses were not restricted to forelimb movement, as a Pavlovian task evoked similar responses. Compared to predictable rewards, unexpected rewards elicited markedly different granule cell activity despite identical stimuli and licking responses. In both tasks, reward signals were widespread throughout multiple cerebellar lobules. Tracking the same granule cells over several days of learning revealed that cells with reward-anticipating responses emerged from those that responded at the start of learning to reward delivery, whereas reward-omission responses grew stronger as learning progressed. The discovery of predictive, non-sensorimotor encoding in granule cells is a major departure from the current understanding of these neurons and markedly enriches the contextual information available to postsynaptic Purkinje cells, with important implications for cognitive processing in the cerebellum.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsAnticipation, PsychologicalBehavior, AnimalCalciumCerebellumCognitionConditioning, ClassicalConditioning, OperantFemaleForelimbLearningMaleMiceMolecular ImagingMovementCalcium

Identifiers

PMID28321129
PMCPMC5532014
OpenAlexW2595087345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.