Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28320947›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Experimental evidence that parasites drive eco-evolutionary feedbacks.

Franziska S Brunner, Jaime M Anaya-Rojas, Blake Matthews, Christophe Eizaguirre

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Basal Parasitic Fungi in Marine Food Webs-A Mystery Yet to Unravel.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Competitive history shapes rapid evolution in a seasonal climate.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Franziska S BrunnerSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom; franziska.brunner@alumni.ethz.ch.
Jaime M Anaya-RojasAquatic Ecology Department, Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Research and Technology, 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland.
Blake MatthewsAquatic Ecology Department, Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Research and Technology, 6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland.
Christophe EizaguirreSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.
Queen Mary University of London · GBSwiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host resistance to parasites is a rapidly evolving trait that can influence how hosts modify ecosystems. Eco-evolutionary feedbacks may develop if the ecosystem effects of host resistance influence selection on subsequent host generations. In a mesocosm experiment, using a recently diverged (<100 generations) pair of lake and stream three-spined sticklebacks, we tested how experimental exposure to a common fish parasite (

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionDisease ResistanceEcosystemFish DiseasesHost-Parasite InteractionsLakesSmegmamorphaTrematodaeco-evolutionary dynamicseutrophicationGyrodactylushost–parasite interactionthree-spined stickleback

Identifiers

PMID28320947
PMCPMC5389293
OpenAlexW2600661920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.