ReviewJournal of bacteriology2017
Replication Restart in Bacteria.
Review in Journal of bacteriology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Domain dynamics within the PriA DNA helicase regulate DNA replication restart.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- The RecBCD complex interacts directly with the DNA sliding clamp in Escherichia coli.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- A conundrum resolved: regulation and activation of UvrD-family DNA helicases/translocases.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of chromosomal DNA replication in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- Rescuing the bacterial replisome at a nick requires recombinational repair and helicase reloading.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A back-up mechanism for replication.eLife · 2025Article
- Article
- Saccharin disrupts bacterial cell envelope stability and interferes with DNA replication dynamics.EMBO molecular medicine · 2025Article
- UV induces codirectional replication-transcription conflicts and an alternative DnaA-dependent replication origin in the rnhAB mutants of Escherichiacoli.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Hallmarks of DNA replication stress responses in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Clues to transcription/replication collision-induced DNA damage: it was RNAP, in the chromosome, with the fork.FEBS letters · 2025Review
- Article
- Defects in the central metabolism prevent thymineless death in Escherichia coli, while still allowing significant protein synthesis.Genetics · 2024Article
- The intrinsically disordered linker in the single-stranded DNA-binding protein influences DNA replication restart and recombination pathways inJournal of bacteriology · 2024Article
- SMC-based immunity against extrachromosomal DNA elements.Biochemical Society transactions · 2023Article
- Replication fork binding triggers structural changes in the PriA helicase that govern DNA replication restart in E. coli.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Beneficial and detrimental genes in the cellular response to replication arrest.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Identification of genetic interactions with priB links the PriA/PriB DNA replication restart pathway to double-strand DNA break repair in Escherichia coli.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Robust linear DNA degradation supports replication-initiation-defective mutants in Escherichia coli.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Role for DNA double strand end-resection activity of RecBCD in control of aberrant chromosomal replication initiation in Escherichia coli.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In bacteria, replication forks assembled at a replication origin travel to the terminus, often a few megabases away. They may encounter obstacles that trigger replisome disassembly, rendering replication restart from abandoned forks crucial for cell viability. During the past 25 years, the genes that encode replication restart proteins have been identified and genetically characterized. In parallel, the enzymes were purified and analyzed
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.