Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28320795›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Cross-sectional survey on defensive practices and defensive behaviours among Israeli psychiatrists.

I Reuveni, I Pelov, H Reuveni, O Bonne, L Canetti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07405411 (The Prevalence, Causes, and Prevention Strategies of Medical Malpractice in Psychiatric Clinics), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07405411 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Prevalence, Causes, and Prevention Strategies of Medical Malpractice in Psychiatric Clinics: A Descriptive and Correlational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorAbant Izzet Baysal UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled180ConditionsPsychiatric Hospitalization, Patient Safety
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Examining the role of psychiatrists in involuntary admissions under the Mental Health Act in New Zealand.Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ethical challenges in contemporary psychiatry: an overview and an appraisal of possible strategies and research needs.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Collateral Victims of Defensive Medical Practice.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

I ReuveniDepartment of Psychiatry, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
I PelovDepartment of Psychiatry, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
H ReuveniDepartment of Health Systems Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
O BonneDepartment of Psychiatry, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
L CanettiDepartment of Psychiatry, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hadassah Medical Center · ILBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePsychiatry is a low-risk specialisation; however, there is a steady increase in malpractice claims against psychiatrists. Defensive psychiatry (DP) refers to any action undertaken by a psychiatrist to avoid malpractice liability that is not for the sole benefit of the patient's mental health and well-being. The objectives of this study were to assess the scope of DP practised by psychiatrists and to understand whether awareness of DP correlated with defensive behaviours.

methodsA questionnaire was administered to 213 Israeli psychiatry residents and certified psychiatrists during May and June 2015 regarding demographic data and experience with malpractice claims, medicolegal literature and litigation. Four clinical scenarios represented defensive behaviours and reactions (feelings and actions) to malpractice claims.

resultsForty-four (20.6%) certified psychiatrists and four (1.9%) residents were directly involved in malpractice claims, while 132 (62.1%) participants admitted to practising DP. Residents acknowledged the practice of DP more than did senior psychiatrists (p=0.038).Awareness of DP correlated with unnecessary hospitalisation of suicidal patients, increased unnecessary follow-up visits and prescribing smaller drug dosages than required for pregnant women and elderly patients.

conclusionsThis study provides evidence that DP is well established in the routine clinical daily practice of psychiatrists. Further studies are needed to reveal whether DP effectively protects psychiatrists from malpractice suits or, rather, if it impedes providing quality psychiatric care and represents an economic burden that leads to more harm for the patient.

Indexed as

Defensive MedicineFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyIsraelMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatrySurveys and QuestionnairesDefensive MedicineDefensive Psychiatry (DP)Medical Malpractice

Identifiers

PMID28320795
PMCPMC5372095
OpenAlexW2602295980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.