Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28320794›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Innovative public-private partnership to target subsidised antimalarials: a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate a community intervention in Western Kenya.

Jeremiah Laktabai, Adriane Lesser, Alyssa Platt, Elisa Maffioli, Manoj Mohanan, Diana Menya, Wendy Prudhomme O'Meara, Elizabeth L Turner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02461628 (Innovative Partnership to Target Antimalarial Subsidies in the Retail Sector), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02461628 nacompletednot on this map

Innovative Partnership to Target Antimalarial Subsidies in the Retail Sector

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2015 to 2017Enrolled40,340ConditionsFever, MalariaArmsMalaria RDT & conditional voucher for ACT from retail sector
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeremiah LaktabaiMoi School of Medicine, Eldoret, Kenya.
Adriane LesserDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Alyssa PlattDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Elisa MaffioliDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Manoj MohananDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Diana MenyaMoi University School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Eldoret, Kenya.
Wendy Prudhomme O'MearaDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Elizabeth L TurnerDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke Institute for Health Innovation · USDuke University · USMoi University · KEDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

Innovative partnership to target antimalarial subsidies in the retail sectorR01AI110478 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PRUDHOMMEOMEARA, WENDY · 2014 to 2017
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI110478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere are concerns of inappropriate use of subsidised antimalarials due to the large number of fevers treated in the informal sector with minimal access to diagnostic testing. Targeting antimalarial subsidies to confirmed malaria cases can lead to appropriate, effective therapy. There is evidence that community health volunteers (CHVs) can be trained to safely and correctly use rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). This study seeks to evaluate the public health impact of targeted antimalarial subsidies delivered through a partnership between CHVs and the private retail sector. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We are conducting a stratified cluster-randomised controlled trial in Western Kenya where 32 community units were randomly assigned to the intervention or control (usual care) arm. In the intervention arm, CHVs offer free RDT testing to febrile individuals and, conditional on a positive test result, a voucher to purchase a WHO-qualified artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) at a reduced fixed price in the retail sector.Study outcomes in individuals with a febrile illness in the previous 4 weeks will be ascertained through population-based cross-sectional household surveys at four time points: baseline, 6, 12 and 18 months postbaseline. The primary outcome is the proportion of fevers that receives a malaria test from any source (CHV or health facility). The main secondary outcome is the proportion of ACTs used by people with a malaria-positive test. Other secondary outcomes include: the proportion of ACTs used by people without a test and adherence to test results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the National Institutes of Health, the Moi University School of Medicine Institutional Research and Ethics Committee and the Duke University Medical Center Institutional Review Board. Findings will be reported on clinicalstrials.gov, in peer-reviewed publications and through stakeholder meetings including those with the Kenyan Ministry of Health. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Pre-results, NCT02461628.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersPublic-Private Sector PartnershipsResearch DesignAdolescentAdultAntimalarialsChildChild, PreschoolCluster AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantKenyaMalariaMaleAntimalarialsantimalarial subsidiescommunity health volunteersmalariarapid diagnostic test

Identifiers

PMID28320794
PMCPMC5372155
OpenAlexW2603213641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.