Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28320789›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

'right@home': a randomised controlled trial of sustained nurse home visiting from pregnancy to child age 2 years, versus usual care, to improve parent care, parent responsivity and the home learning environment at 2 years.

Sharon Goldfeld, Anna Price, Hannah Bryson, Tracey Bruce, Fiona Mensah, Francesca Orsini, Lisa Gold, Harriet Hiscock, Charlene Smith, Lara Bishop and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Low language capacity in childhood: A systematic review of prevalence estimates.International journal of language & communication disorders
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Sharon GoldfeldCentre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Anna PriceCentre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Hannah BrysonCentre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Tracey BruceIngham Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Fiona MensahDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Francesca OrsiniClinical Sciences and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Lisa GoldSchool of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Harriet HiscockCentre for Community Child Health, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Charlene SmithAustralian Research Alliance for Children and Youth, Canberra City, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Lara BishopPopulation Health, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Dianne JacksonAustralian Research Alliance for Children and Youth, Canberra City, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Lynn KempIngham Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Murdoch Children's Research Institute · AUACT GovernmentUniversity of Melbourne · AUDeakin University · AUIngham Institute · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AUWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBy the time children start school, inequities in learning, development and health outcomes are already evident. Sustained nurse home visiting (SNHV) offers a potential platform for families experiencing adversity, who often have limited access to services. While SNHV programmes have been growing in popularity in Australia and internationally, it is not known whether they can improve children's learning and development when offered via the Australian service system. The right@home trial aims to investigate the effectiveness of an SNHV programme, offered to women from pregnancy to child age 2 years, in improving parent care of and responsivity to the child, and the home learning environment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Pregnant Australian women (n=722) are identified after completing a screening survey of 10 factors known to predict children's learning and development (eg, young pregnancy, poor mental or physical health, lack of support). Consenting women-surveyed while attending clinics at 10 hospitals in Victoria and Tasmania-are enrolled if they report having 2 or more risk factors. The intervention comprises 25 home visits from pregnancy to 2 years, focusing on parent care of the child, responsivity to the child and providing a good quality home learning environment. The standard, universal, Australian child and family health service provides the comparator (control). Primary outcome measures include a combination of parent-reported and objective assessments of children's sleep, safety, nutrition, parenting styles and the home learning environment, including the Home Observation of the Environment Inventory and items adapted from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the Royal Children's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committees (HREC 32296) and site-specific HRECs. The investigators and sponsor will communicate the trial results to stakeholders, participants, healthcare professionals, the public and other relevant groups via presentations and publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN89962120, pre-results.

Indexed as

House CallsMaternal BehaviorParentingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMalePostnatal CarePregnancyProgram EvaluationTasmaniaVictoriachild developmenthome visitsmaternal healthrandomised controlled trialsocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID28320789
PMCPMC5372045
OpenAlexW2602890751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.