Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28320717›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2017

Ryuta Kishii, Yuko Yamaguchi, Masaya Takei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular and phenotypic characterization ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Staph wars: the antibiotic pipeline strikes back.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  17. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryuta KishiiWatarase Research Center, Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tochigi, Japan ryuuta.kishii@mb.kyorin-pharm.co.jp.
Yuko YamaguchiWatarase Research Center, Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tochigi, Japan.
Masaya TakeiWatarase Research Center, Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tochigi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lascufloxacin exhibited a broad spectrum of activity against various clinical isolates. Furthermore, lascufloxacin showed the most potent activity against Gram-positive bacteria among the quinolones tested and incomplete cross-resistance against existing quinolone-resistant strains. Enzymatic analysis indicated that lascufloxacin had potent inhibitory activity against both wild-type and mutated target enzymes. These results suggest that lascufloxacin may be useful in treating infections caused by various pathogens, including quinolone-resistant strains.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliFluoroquinolonesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinoloneslascufloxacinantimicrobial activityantimicrobial agentsquinolones

Identifiers

PMID28320717
PMCPMC5444182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.