Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28320635›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Neurology2017

Safety and efficacy of multipotent adult progenitor cells in acute ischaemic stroke (MASTERS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

David C Hess, Lawrence R Wechsler, Wayne M Clark, Sean I Savitz, Gary A Ford, David Chiu, Dileep R Yavagal, Ken Uchino, David S Liebeskind, Alexander P Auchus and 4 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 230 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
230citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
23.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01436487 phase2completednot on this map

Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Safety and Efficacy Trial of MultiStem® in Adults With Ischemic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorHealios K.K.Ran2011 to 2015Enrolled134ConditionsIschemic StrokeArmsMultiStem, Placebo
NCT03545607 phase3terminatednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

MultiStem® Administration for Stroke Treatment and Enhanced Recovery Study (MASTERS-2)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHealios K.K.Ran2018 to 2024Enrolled206ConditionsIschemic StrokeArmsMultiStem, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

230 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 361 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. A review and meta-analysis of stem cell therapies in stroke patients: effectiveness and safety evaluation.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. [Research progress of different types of stem cells in treatment of ischemic stroke].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Stem cell transplantation for ischemic stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Review

170 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

David C HessDepartment of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. Electronic address: dhess@augusta.edu.
Lawrence R WechslerDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Wayne M ClarkDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.
Sean I SavitzDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Gary A FordRadcliffe Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, USA.
David ChiuDepartment of Neurology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Dileep R YavagalDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Ken UchinoCerebrovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
David S LiebeskindNeurovascular Imaging Research Core, Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alexander P AuchusDepartment of Neurology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Souvik SenDepartment of Neurology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USA.
Cathy A SilaDepartment of Neurology, University Hospitals-Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jeffrey D VestMedpace, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Robert W MaysAthersys, Inc, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Athersys (United States) · USAugusta University · USCleveland Clinic · USJackson Memorial Hospital · USMedpace (United States) · USMethodist Hospital · USOregon Health & Science University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultipotent adult progenitor cells are a bone marrow-derived, allogeneic, cell therapy product that modulates the immune system, and represents a promising therapy for acute stroke. We aimed to identify the highest, well-tolerated, and safest single dose of multipotent adult progenitor cells, and if they were efficacious as a treatment for stroke recovery.

methodsWe did a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial of intravenous multipotent adult progenitor cells in 33 centres in the UK and the USA. We used a computer-generated randomisation sequence and interactive voice and web response system to assign patients aged 18-83 years with moderately severe acute ischaemic stroke and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 8-20 to treatment with intravenous multipotent adult progenitor cells (400 million or 1200 million cells) or placebo between 24 h and 48 h after symptom onset. Patients were ineligible if there was a change in NIHSS of four or more points during at least a 6 h period between screening and randomisation, had brainstem or lacunar infarct, a substantial comorbid disease, an inability to undergo an MRI scan, or had a history of splenectomy. In group 1, patients were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive 400 million cells or placebo and assessed for safety through 7 days. In group 2, patients were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive 1200 million cells or placebo and assessed for safety through the first 7 days. In group 3, patients were enrolled, randomly assigned, and stratified by baseline NIHSS score to receive 1200 million cells or placebo in a 1:1 ratio within 24-48 h. Patients, investigators, and clinicians were masked to treatment assignment. The primary safety outcome was dose-limiting toxicity effects. The primary efficacy endpoint was global stroke recovery, which combines dichotomised results from the modified Rankin scale, change in NIHSS score from baseline, and Barthel index at day 90. Analysis was by intention to treat (ITT) including all patients in groups 2 and 3 who received the investigational agent or placebo. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01436487.

findingsThe study was done between Oct 24, 2011, and Dec 7, 2015. After safety assessments in eight patients in group 1, 129 patients were randomly assigned (67 to receive multipotent adult progenitor cells and 62 to receive placebo) in groups 2 and 3 (1200 million cells). The ITT populations consisted of 65 patients who received multipotent adult progenitor cells and 61 patients who received placebo. There were no dose-limiting toxicity events in either group. There were no infusional or allergic reactions and no difference in treatment-emergent adverse events between the groups (64 [99%] of 65 patients in the multipotent adult progenitor cell group vs 59 [97%] of 61 in the placebo group). There was no difference between the multipotent adult progenitor cell group and placebo groups in global stroke recovery at day 90 (odds ratio 1·08 [95% CI 0·55-2·09], p=0·83).

interpretationAdministration of multipotent adult progenitor cells was safe and well tolerated in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Although no significant improvement was observed at 90 days in neurological outcomes with multipotent adult progenitor cells treatment, further clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of the intervention in an earlier time window after stroke (<36 h) are planned.

fundingAthersys Inc.

Indexed as

AdultAdult Stem CellsAgedBone Marrow TransplantationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultipotent Stem CellsRecovery of FunctionStrokeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28320635
OpenAlexW2595336446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.