Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28320482›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Pressure RElieving Support SUrfaces: a Randomised Evaluation 2 (PRESSURE 2) photographic validation sub-study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Elizabeth McGinnis, Sarah Brown, Howard Collier, Phil Faulks, Rachael Gilberts, Clare Greenwood, Valerie Henderson, Delia Muir, Andrea Nelson, Jane Nixon and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Reactive air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Support surfaces for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth McGinnisClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. e.mcginnis@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2848-9149
Sarah BrownClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Howard CollierClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Phil FaulksMedical Teaching Centre, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Rachael GilbertsClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Clare GreenwoodLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Valerie HendersonNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Tyneside, UK.
Delia MuirClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Andrea NelsonSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Jane NixonClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Isabelle SmithClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Nikki StubbsLeeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust St Marys Hospital, Leeds, LS12 3QE, UK.
Kay WalkerPressure Ulcer Research Service User Network, Leeds, UK.
Lyn WilsonClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Susanne ColemanClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
University of Leeds · GBLeeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNIHR Research Delivery Network · GBNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health 11/36/33
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPRESSURE 2 is a randomised evaluation of the clinical and cost effectiveness of two types of pressure relieving mattress for the prevention of pressure ulcers. The primary endpoint is the time to development of a Category ≥2 pressure ulcer. The current 'gold standard' for the identification of a Category ≥2 pressure ulcer is expert clinical assessment. Due to the appearance of the bed, it is not possible to achieve blinding of the endpoint. This therefore poses a risk to the internal validity of the study. A possible approach is to use photographs of skin sites, with central blinded review. However, there are practical and scientific concerns including whether patients would agree to photographs; the burden of data collection; the quality of photographs; the completeness of data; and how the use of photographs compares with the current 'gold standard'. This validation sub-study aims to assess and quantify potential bias in the reporting of the trial endpoint. METHODS/

designPatients will be specifically asked to consent to photographs being taken of their skin sites. Photographs will be taken at first observation or when patients develop a new Category ≥2 pressure ulcer (to assess over-reporting). A 10% random sample of patients will be identified for additional photographs of two skin sites (one torso and one limb) with and without a pressure ulcer (if present) by an independent assessor (to assess the potential for under-reporting). Staff will be trained to take photographs using a standardised camera and photographic technique. A 'grey scale' will be included in the photo to correct white balance. Photographs will be securely transferred for central review. Photographs will have white balance corrected, and the computer monitor will be calibrated prior to review. Analysis will include assessment of under- and over-reporting, acceptability of photography to patients, secure transfer of data, quality of and confidence in blinded photograph review and sensitivity analysis using photograph assessment of primary outcome. DISCUSSION: This study will use photographs to contribute to the primary outcome of the trial. It will inform our understanding of the acceptability of photography for prevention trials and the possibility of other uses of photographic data in clinical work and research.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN01151335 . Registered on 14 May 2013.

Indexed as

BedsWound HealingClinical ProtocolsEndpoint DeterminationEquipment DesignHumansPhotographyPredictive Value of TestsPressure UlcerReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignSkinTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomBlinded outcome assessmentPressure ulcerRandomised controlled trialWound photography

Identifiers

PMID28320482
PMCPMC5360042
OpenAlexW2598166111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.