Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28320477›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2017

Risk prediction model for knee pain in the Nottingham community: a Bayesian modelling approach.

G S Fernandes, A Bhattacharya, D F McWilliams, S L Ingham, M Doherty, W Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Football Risk Prediction.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

G S FernandesDivision of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
A BhattacharyaDivision of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
D F McWilliamsDivision of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
S L InghamFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Carys Bannister Building, Dover Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
M DohertyDivision of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
W ZhangDivision of Rheumatology, Orthopaedics and Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. weiya.zhang@nottingham.ac.uk.
Nottingham City Hospital · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBVersus Arthritis · GB

Funding

DATA COORDINATING CENTER FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVEN01AR22258 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NEVITT, MICHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$13.5M
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVEN01AR22259 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HOCHBERG, MARC C. · 2007 to 2011
$7.8M
Clinical Centers for the Osteoarthritis Initiative^Rhode IslandN01AR22262 · NIAMS · MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF RHODE ISLAND · PI EATON, CHARLES B. · 2007 to 2010
$6.8M
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVEN01AR22261 · NIAMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FDN · PI JACKSON, REBECCA · 2007 to 2011
$6.2M
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVEN01AR22260 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · 2007 to 2010
$6.1M
NEW PHARMACOLOGY ASPECTS RELATED TO CARBONIC ANHYDRASER01HL022258 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MAREN, THOMAS H · 1985 to 1986
–
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE-N01AR22260N01AR022260 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH · PI KWOH, KENT · 2002 to 2006
–
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE-N01AR22261N01AR022261 · NIAMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH · PI JACKSON, REBECCA · 2002 to 2006
–
CLINICAL CENTER FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS-264022262-264022262N01AR022262 · NIAMS · THE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL · PI ASSAF, ANNLOUISE R. · 2002 to 2006
–
CLINICAL CENTERS FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE-264022259-264022259N01AR022259 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND AT BALT · PI HOCHBERG, MARC C. · 2002 to 2006
–
Arthritis Research UKNHLBI NIH HHS N01AR22258NIAMS NIH HHS N01AR22259NIAMS NIH HHS N01AR22260NIAMS NIH HHS N01AR22261NIAMS NIH HHS N01AR22262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwenty-five percent of the British population over the age of 50 years experiences knee pain. Knee pain can limit physical ability and cause distress and bears significant socioeconomic costs. The objectives of this study were to develop and validate the first risk prediction model for incident knee pain in the Nottingham community and validate this internally within the Nottingham cohort and externally within the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) cohort.

methodsA total of 1822 participants from the Nottingham community who were at risk for knee pain were followed for 12 years. Of this cohort, two-thirds (n = 1203) were used to develop the risk prediction model, and one-third (n = 619) were used to validate the model. Incident knee pain was defined as pain on most days for at least 1 month in the past 12 months. Predictors were age, sex, body mass index, pain elsewhere, prior knee injury and knee alignment. A Bayesian logistic regression model was used to determine the probability of an OR >1. The Hosmer-Lemeshow χ

resultsA risk prediction model for knee pain incidence was developed using a Bayesian approach. The model had good calibration, with an HLS of 7.17 (p = 0.52) and moderate discriminative ability (ROC 0.70) in the community. Individual scenarios are given using the model. However, the model had poor calibration (HLS 5866.28, p < 0.01) and poor discriminative ability (ROC 0.54) in the OAI cohort.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first risk prediction model for knee pain, regardless of underlying structural changes of knee osteoarthritis, in the community using a Bayesian modelling approach. The model appears to work well in a community-based population but not in individuals with a higher risk for knee osteoarthritis, and it may provide a convenient tool for use in primary care to predict the risk of knee pain in the general population.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremLogistic ModelsAgedAlgorithmsArthralgiaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceKnee InjuriesKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePainRisk FactorsBayesian statisticsKnee painMusculoskeletal epidemiologyPrediction modelling

Identifiers

PMID28320477
PMCPMC5359844
OpenAlexW2601532380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.