ReviewCritical care (London, England)2017
Use of 'tidal volume challenge' to improve the reliability of pulse pressure variation.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06123039 (Use of Heart-lung Interaction Parameters to Predict Haemodynamic Tolerance to the Open Lung Approach With Individualised PEEP During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Operating Room), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Use of Heart-lung Interaction Parameters to Predict Haemodynamic Tolerance to the Open Lung Approach With Individualised PEEP During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Operating Room
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Changes in pulse pressure variation induced by passive leg raising test to predict preload responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with low tidal volume in ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Does tidal volume challenge improve the feasibility of pulse pressure variation in patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Pulse pressure variation guided goal-direct fluid therapy decreases postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Trial
- Comparison of the carotid corrected flow time and tidal volume challenge for assessing fluid responsiveness in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Trial
- The increase in cardiac output induced by a decrease in positive end-expiratory pressure reliably detects volume responsiveness: the PEEP-test study.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Passive leg raising in brain injury patients within the neurointensive care unit. A prospective trial.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2021Trial
- Respiratory variation in carotid artery blood flow peak velocity combined with tidal volume challenge in predicting fluid responsiveness of lung-protective ventilation patients: a feasibility study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Less-Invasive Hemodynamic and Tissue Perfusion Monitoring in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The predictive value of tidal volume challenge-induced hemodynamic changes for fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery with one-lung ventilation: a prospective observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Observational
- The time course of fluid responsiveness.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- Heart-Lung Interactions in Combined Distributive Shock and ARDS: Applied Cardiopulmonary Physiology at the Bedside.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Assessing fluid responsiveness by using functional hemodynamic tests in critically ill patients: a narrative review and a profile-based clinical guide.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Review
- Improved Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Ventilated Patients With Low Tidal Volume: The Role of Preload Variation.Critical care explorations · 2025Article
- Management of adult sepsis in resource-limited settings: global expert consensus statements using a Delphi method.Intensive care medicine · 2025Review
- The Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Position Statement on the Management of Sepsis in Resource-limited Settings.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Review
- Value of carotid corrected flow time or changes value of FTc could be more useful in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted gynecologic surgery: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Meta-analysis of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) studies: a few rotten apples can spoil the whole barrel.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Article
- Monitoring Macro- and Microcirculation in the Critically Ill: A Narrative Review.Avicenna journal of medicine · 2023Review
- Lung Recruitment Assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography (RECRUIT): A Multicenter Study of COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2017. Other selected articles can be found online at http://ccforum.com/series/annualupdate2017 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.