Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28320376›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2017

How to make carer involvement in mental health inpatient units happen: a focus group study with patients, carers and clinicians.

Domenico Giacco, Aysegul Dirik, Justina Kaselionyte, Stefan Priebe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Family-centered collaborative care for patients with chronic mental illness: A systematic review.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Domenico GiaccoUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, (WHO Centre for Mental Health Service Development), Queen Mary University of London, E138SP, London, UK. d.giacco@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7809-8800
Aysegul DirikUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, (WHO Centre for Mental Health Service Development), Queen Mary University of London, E138SP, London, UK.
Justina KaselionyteUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, (WHO Centre for Mental Health Service Development), Queen Mary University of London, E138SP, London, UK.
Stefan PriebeUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, (WHO Centre for Mental Health Service Development), Queen Mary University of London, E138SP, London, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2015-08-071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarers are family members or friends who support people with a mental health problem without being paid. Carer involvement in mental health treatment has been consistently supported by research evidence and promoted by policies but its implementation rates are poor. Particularly when patients are treated in inpatient units, carers often report being left without information or being excluded from decisions about treatment. In this study we have explored, along with staff perspectives, views of patients and carers who had a recent experience of inpatient mental health care on how to improve the implementation of carer involvement in inpatient care.

methodsSixteen focus groups were held with carers, patients and clinicians in London, United Kingdom. We included staff working in inpatient units and patients and carers who had experience of inpatient care in the last five years. Data from focus groups were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsEighty six participants in total (31 service users, 22 carers and 33 clinicians) attended the focus groups. Participants identified that generally, carer involvement should happen as soon as possible after admission, although this may be challenging in some cases. Carer involvement should include receiving information, participating in decisions about care and discharge and receiving emotional support by staff. When carers are involved, their personal knowledge of the patient's condition should be utilised. Challenges to carer involvement may include problems with identifying carers during a mental health crisis, obtaining valid patient consent, sharing appropriate information, and contacting and engaging carers. Additionally, it was perceived that all the ward staff need to be actively engaged in order to make carer involvement happen and this cannot be left only to specifically trained clinicians.

conclusionsThese findings identify basic components that all family interventions in inpatient units should have. Further studies are needed to explore how and if purposively designed clinical interventions can improve carer involvement in inpatient treatment and, consequently, patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsPsychiatric Department, HospitalAdultAgedCaregiversFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionProfessional-Family RelationsCarersFamilyFriendsInpatient carePsychosisSevere mental disorders

Identifiers

PMID28320376
PMCPMC5359804
OpenAlexW2599847319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.