Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28320348›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2017

Methods for conceptualising 'visual ability' as a measurable construct in children with cerebral palsy.

Belinda Deramore Denver, Margareta Adolfsson, Elspeth Froude, Peter Rosenbaum, Christine Imms

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Belinda Deramore DenverAustralian Catholic University, School of Allied Health, Level 9, 33 Berry Street, North Sydney, NSW, 2060, Australia. belinda.deramoredenver@myacu.edu.au.
Margareta AdolfssonJönköping University, CHILD, School of Education and Communication, Box 1026, 551 11, Jönköping, Sweden.
Elspeth FroudeAustralian Catholic University, School of Allied Health, Level 9, 33 Berry Street, North Sydney, NSW, 2060, Australia.
Peter RosenbaumMcMaster University, IAHS Building, Room 408, 1400 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 1C7, Canada.
Christine ImmsAustralian Catholic University, School of Allied Health, Level 2, Daniel Mannix Building, 17 Young Street, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia.
Australian Catholic University · AUJönköping University · SEMcMaster University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVision influences functioning and disability of children with cerebral palsy, so there is a growing need for psychometrically robust tools to advance assessment of children's vision abilities in clinical practice and research. Vision is a complex construct, and in the absence of clarity about this construct it is challenging to know whether valid, reliable measures exist. This study reports a method for conceptualising 'visual ability' as a measurable construct.

methodsUsing the items from 19 assessment tools previously identified in a systematic review, this study used a two-phase process: first, deductive content analysis linked items to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health - Child and Youth version (ICF-CY), and second, vision-specific 'Activity'-level items were explored using inductive thematic analysis.

resultsThe linking and content analysis identified that existing assessment tools are measuring vision across the ICF-CY domains of Body Functions, Activities and Participation, and Environmental and Personal Factors. Items specifically coded to vision at the Activity level were defined as measuring 'how vision is used', and these items form the basis of the conceptualisation that 'visual ability' is measurable as a single construct. The thematic analysis led to the identification of 3 categories containing 13 themes that reflect a child's observable visual behaviours. Seven abilities reflect how a child uses vision: responds or reacts, initiates, maintains or sustains looking, changes or shifts looking, searches, locates or finds, and follows. Four interactions reflect the contexts in which a child uses their vision to purposefully interact: watches and visually interacts with people and faces, objects, over distance, and with hands. Finally, two themes reflect a child's overall use of vision in daily activities: frequency of use, and efficiency of use.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates an approach to exploring and explaining a complex topic utilising World Health Organization language and building on existing research. Despite the complexity of vision, the concept of 'how vision is used' can be clearly defined as a measurable construct at the Activity level of the ICF-CY. This study has identified observable visual behaviours that may be developed into items assessing how vision is used in daily activities.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationActivities of Daily LivingCerebral PalsyHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePersons with DisabilitiesPsychometricsQuality of LifeVision, OcularVision Tests

Identifiers

PMID28320348
PMCPMC5359986
OpenAlexW2600652237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.