Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28320310›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

TreeToReads - a pipeline for simulating raw reads from phylogenies.

Emily Jane McTavish, James Pettengill, Steven Davis, Hugh Rand, Errol Strain, Marc Allard, Ruth E Timme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. mSphere · 2021
    Article
  4. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  5. A broad survey of DNA sequence data simulation tools.Briefings in functional genomics · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily Jane McTavishUniversity of California, Merced, Merced, CA, USA. ejmctavish@ucmerced.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9766-5727
James PettengillCenter for Food Safety and Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.
Steven DavisCenter for Food Safety and Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.
Hugh RandCenter for Food Safety and Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.
Errol StrainCenter for Food Safety and Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.
Marc AllardCenter for Food Safety and Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.
Ruth E TimmeCenter for Food Safety and Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing phylogenomic analysis tools for tracking pathogens has become standard practice in academia, public health agencies, and large industries. Using the same raw read genomic data as input, there are several different approaches being used to infer phylogenetic tree. These include many different SNP pipelines, wgMLST approaches, k-mer algorithms, whole genome alignment and others; each of these has advantages and disadvantages, some have been extensively validated, some are faster, some have higher resolution. A few of these analysis approaches are well-integrated into the regulatory process of US Federal agencies (e.g. the FDA's SNP pipeline for tracking foodborne pathogens). However, despite extensive validation on benchmark datasets and comparison with other pipelines, we lack methods for fully exploring the effects of multiple parameter values in each pipeline that can potentially have an effect on whether the correct phylogenetic tree is recovered.

resultsTo resolve this problem, we offer a program, TreeToReads, which can generate raw read data from mutated genomes simulated under a known phylogeny. This simulation pipeline allows direct comparisons of simulated and observed data in a controlled environment. At each step of these simulations, researchers can vary parameters of interest (e.g., input tree topology, amount of sequence divergence, rate of indels, read coverage, distance of reference genome, etc) to assess the effects of various parameter values on correctly calling SNPs and reconstructing an accurate tree.

conclusionsSuch critical assessments of the accuracy and robustness of analytical pipelines are essential to progress in both research and applied settings.

Indexed as

PhylogenyGenomicsGenomicsPhylogeneticsSimulation

Identifiers

PMID28320310
PMCPMC5359950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.