ArticleDisability and rehabilitation2018
Patient-centered mobility outcome preferences according to individuals with stroke and caregivers: a qualitative analysis.
Article in Disability and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06827093 (Augmented Dyadic Interventions to Boost Quality of Life Among Stroke Survivors and Care Partners in Pakistan.), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Augmented Dyadic Interventions to Boost Quality of Life Among Stroke Survivors and Care Partners in Pakistan.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Core Set of Outcome Measures to Assess Physical Function for Adults Participating in Physical Therapist Treatment in the Hospital: A Clinical Practice Guideline.Physical therapy · 2025Guideline
- Coherence of Stroke Survivors' Lived Experiences and the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Time-course for acquiring transfer independence in patients with subacute stroke: a prospective cohort study.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2024Article
- Impaired mobility and MRI markers of vascular brain injury: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities and UK Biobank studies.BMJ neurology open · 2024Article
- Factors that influence the provision of home-based rehabilitation services for people needing rehabilitation: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Standardized tools for assessing balance and mobility in stroke clinical practice guidelines worldwide: A scoping review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2023Article
- Effects of a family-focused dyadic psychoeducational intervention for stroke survivors and their family caregivers: a pilot study.BMC nursing · 2022Article
- Person-centred care in individuals with stroke: a qualitative study using in-depth interviews.Annals of medicine · 2022Article
- Important-performance analysis to conceptualize goal priorities in community dwelling stroke survivors.Topics in stroke rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Clinicians and individuals with acquired brain injury perspectives about factors that influence mobility: creating a core set of mobility domains among individuals with acquired brain injury.Annals of medicine · 2021Article
- Positive Beliefs and the Likelihood of Successful Community Discharge From Skilled Nursing Facilities.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Acute stroke awareness of family physicians: translation of policy to practice.Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
- The Experience of a Neurocritical Care Admission and Discharge for Patients and Their Families: A Qualitative Analysis.The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses · 2020Article
- Stroke Survivors' Perspectives on Post-Acute Rehabilitation Options, Goals, Satisfaction, and Transition to Home.Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT · 2019Article
- Stroke Survivor and Caregiver Perspectives on Post-Stroke Visual Concerns and Long-Term Consequences.Behavioural neurology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo explore the mobility-related preferences among stroke survivors and caregivers following post-acute rehabilitation at inpatient or skilled nursing facilities.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study; semi-structured, qualitative interviews of stroke survivors (n = 24) and informal caregivers (n = 15) were conducted. The participants were recruited from the community.
resultsComparative content analysis was used to identify themes by two independent coders. The survivors (68 years) and caregivers (58 years) mentioned mobility-related consequences including inability to walk, balance, drive, and transfer; and increased falls. The survivors (63%) and caregivers (73%) also mentioned the use of assistive devices. The common rehabilitation activities included: walking (62%); followed by standing and mobility; strength and balance; and wheelchair skills. Some stroke survivors were dissatisfied as their rehabilitation was not patient-centered. Frequently mentioned outcome preferences by survivors were ability to walk (88%), move, and balance. They also wanted to acquire assistive devices to move independently. Caregivers were concerned with the survivor's safety and wanted them to drive (53%), prevent falls, have home accommodations, and transfer independently. Caregivers (40%) also expressed the importance of receiving realistic information.
conclusionsThis study suggests a need to consider the stroke survivors' and caregivers' mobility outcome preferences to improve the patient-centered rehabilitation care. Implications for Rehabilitation Stroke survivors and caregivers tend to differ in their outcome preferences. Caregivers expressed concern for transfers, driving, fall prevention, home modifications, and wished for realistic information. Incorporating stroke survivors and their families' perspectives during rehabilitation may enhance patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.