Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28319608›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2017

Cerebellar granule cells acquire a widespread predictive feedback signal during motor learning.

Andrea Giovannucci, Aleksandra Badura, Ben Deverett, Farzaneh Najafi, Talmo D Pereira, Zhenyu Gao, Ilker Ozden, Alexander D Kloth, Eftychios Pnevmatikakis, Liam Paninski and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 132 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 234 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cerebellar microcircuits enable robust evidence-based decisions through cortico-cerebellar coupling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cerebellar contributions to action and cognition: Prediction, timescale, and continuity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  13. Effects of Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Feedforward Inhibitory Circuits on Cerebellar Responses to Repetitive Sensory Input.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea GiovannucciPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Aleksandra BaduraPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Ben DeverettPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Farzaneh NajafiDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6454-2448
Talmo D PereiraPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Zhenyu GaoDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Ilker OzdenPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Alexander D KlothPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Eftychios PnevmatikakisCenter for Computational Biology, Flatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, New York, New York, USA.
Liam PaninskiDepartments of Statistics and Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
Chris I De ZeeuwNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Javier F MedinaDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Samuel S-H WangPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Princeton University · USNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLBaylor College of Medicine · USColumbia University · USErasmus MC · NLSimons Foundation · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Imaging adaptive cerebellar processing at cellular resolution in awake miceR01NS045193 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, SAMUEL SHENG-HUNG · 2003 to 2024
$7.5M
Coding and processing of error signals in inferior olivary-cerebellar networksR01MH093727 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JAVIER F MEDINA · 2011 to 2026
$6.7M
The impact of cerebellar tDCS in local and downstream brain circuits: how much is neuralactivity modulated in the resting state and during sensorimotor processing?RF1MH114269 · NIMH · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MEDINA, JAVIER F · 2017 to 2017
$2.0M
Next-Generation Calcium Imaging Analysis MethodsR01EB022913 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI PANINSKI, LIAM M · 2016 to 2018
$1.1M
Targets of low dose alcohol during cerebellar-driven behavior in miceR21AA025572 · NIAAA · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MEDINA, JAVIER F · 2016 to 2017
$445k
NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA025572NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022913NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093727NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH114269NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar granule cells, which constitute half the brain's neurons, supply Purkinje cells with contextual information necessary for motor learning, but how they encode this information is unknown. Here we show, using two-photon microscopy to track neural activity over multiple days of cerebellum-dependent eyeblink conditioning in mice, that granule cell populations acquire a dense representation of the anticipatory eyelid movement. Initially, granule cells responded to neutral visual and somatosensory stimuli as well as periorbital airpuffs used for training. As learning progressed, two-thirds of monitored granule cells acquired a conditional response whose timing matched or preceded the learned eyelid movements. Granule cell activity covaried trial by trial to form a redundant code. Many granule cells were also active during movements of nearby body structures. Thus, a predictive signal about the upcoming movement is widely available at the input stage of the cerebellar cortex, as required by forward models of cerebellar control.

Indexed as

FeedbackAnimalsAnticipation, PsychologicalCerebellumConditioning, ClassicalLearningMaleMiceMice, TransgenicNeurons

Identifiers

PMID28319608
PMCPMC5704905
OpenAlexW2597662796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.