ArticleJAMA neurology2017
Primary Stroke Centers vs Comprehensive Stroke Centers With Interventional Capabilities: Which Is Better for a Patient With Suspected Stroke?
Article in JAMA neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality of care for acute ischemic stroke in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective study using a National database.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Direct Admission vs. Secondary Transfer to a Comprehensive Stroke Center for Thrombectomy : Retrospective Analysis of a Regional Stroke Registry with 2797 Patients.Clinical neuroradiology · 2020Article
- Stroke onset to needle delay: Where these golden hours are lost? An Egyptian center experience.eNeurologicalSci · 2019Article
- Pre-hospital Triage of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients-Importance of Considering More Than Two Transport Options.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
- Modeling Stroke Patient Transport for All Patients With Suspected Large-Vessel Occlusion.JAMA neurology · 2018Article
- Clinical benefit of improved Prehospital stroke scales to detect stroke patients with large vessel occlusions: results from a conditional probabilistic model.BMC neurology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28319234What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.